Reeves J H, Butt W W
Royal Children's Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Melbourne, Australia.
Pediatr Nephrol. 1996 Feb;10(1):58-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00863446.
The aim of this study was to compare the early haemodynamic effects of continuous arteriovenous haemofiltration (CAVH) with those of continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) in normal and endotoxic piglets, within the framework of a two-period cross-over trial. Sixteen domestic piglets (weight 6-18 kg) underwent 1 h of CAVH followed by 1 h of CVVH or 1 h of CVVH followed by 1 h of CAVH. Six were pre-treated with a graded endotoxin infusion to simulate clinical sepsis. The main measurements included: heart rate; mean arterial (MAP), pulmonary artery, central venous and pulmonary artery occlusion pressures; thermodilution cardiac output; and calculated systemic (SVRI) and pulmonary vascular resistance indexes. Each measurement was performed immediately before and 30 min after commencement of each technique of filtration. Commencement of haemofiltration in normal piglets caused minimal haemodynamic effects. In endotoxic piglets, commencement of filtration, whether CAVH or CVVH, caused a haemodynamic change which was significantly more pronounced in the first filter (SVRI -39%, MAP -32%) than the second filter (SVRI +22%, MAP +0.9%) (SVRI, P=0.01, first filter vs. second) (MAP, P=0.009 first filter vs. second). In conclusion, there were no significant differences between the early haemodynamic effects of CAVH and CVVH in normal or endotoxic piglets. The haemodynamic effects of either technique may become more significant in the presence of sepsis.
本研究旨在比较正常和内毒素血症仔猪连续动静脉血液滤过(CAVH)与连续静脉静脉血液滤过(CVVH)的早期血流动力学效应,该研究为两阶段交叉试验。16只家猪(体重6 - 18千克)先进行1小时的CAVH,随后进行1小时的CVVH,或先进行1小时的CVVH,随后进行1小时的CAVH。其中6只猪预先接受分级内毒素输注以模拟临床脓毒症。主要测量指标包括:心率;平均动脉压(MAP)、肺动脉压、中心静脉压和肺动脉闭塞压;热稀释心输出量;以及计算得出的全身血管阻力指数(SVRI)和肺血管阻力指数。每次滤过技术开始前及开始后30分钟进行各项测量。正常仔猪开始血液滤过引起的血流动力学效应最小。在内毒素血症仔猪中,无论是CAVH还是CVVH,滤过开始时均引起血流动力学变化,且第一次滤过时变化更为显著(SVRI - 39%,MAP - 32%),而第二次滤过时变化较小(SVRI + 22%,MAP + 0.9%)(SVRI,P = 0.01,第一次滤过与第二次滤过相比)(MAP,P = 0.009,第一次滤过与第二次滤过相比)。总之,正常或内毒素血症仔猪中CAVH和CVVH的早期血流动力学效应无显著差异。在脓毒症存在时,两种技术的血流动力学效应可能会更显著。