Baldamus C A, Ernst W, Fassbinder W, Koch K M
Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc. 1980;17:205-12.
In 12 RDT patients the volume removal related haemodynamic changes were correlated with concomitant changes in sympathetic activity during pure ultrafiltration (UF), post dilution haemofiltration (HF) and haemodialysis using either acetate (HDA) or bicarbonate (HDB) as buffer substitute. Total peripheral resistance (TPR) and plasma noradrenaline concentrations (PNA) increased during UF indicating a qualitatively adequate reaction of ESRD patients to volume removal. This physiological response is maintained during HF, resulting in intratreatment haemodynamic stability. In contrast no increase of PNA and insignificant changes of TPR were seen in HDA and HDB. As small molecule clearances were matched to those in HF, the behaviour of PNA indicates that not PNA removal but an impaired sympathetic response during HDA and HDB is responsible for the inadequate rise of TPR.
在12例接受肾替代治疗(RDT)的患者中,在单纯超滤(UF)、后稀释血液滤过(HF)以及使用醋酸盐(HDA)或碳酸氢盐(HDB)作为缓冲液替代物的血液透析过程中,与容量清除相关的血流动力学变化与交感神经活动的伴随变化相关。在超滤过程中,总外周阻力(TPR)和血浆去甲肾上腺素浓度(PNA)升高,表明终末期肾病(ESRD)患者对容量清除有定性上适当的反应。这种生理反应在血液滤过过程中得以维持,从而导致治疗期间血流动力学稳定。相比之下,在HDA和HDB治疗中未观察到PNA升高且TPR变化不显著。由于小分子清除率与血液滤过中的清除率相匹配,PNA的表现表明,在HDA和HDB治疗期间,不是PNA清除而是交感神经反应受损导致TPR升高不足。