Thilothammal N, Krishnamurthy P V, Banu K, Gandhimathy S
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, Madras.
Indian Pediatr. 1995 Mar;32(3):295-9.
Assessment of compliance in drug taking is a problem in a crowded Outpatient Department. Using riboflavin as a urinary marker is a simple and rational method. Identifying riboflavin in the urine by fluorescence on exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays or torch light is being used in medical practice but not extensively. In this study, the validity and reliability of these methods were assessed. The sensitivity and specificity of this test by UV method was 86% and 82% for Reader I (medical person) and 82% and 94% for Reader II (paramedical person). For Reader I, the accuracy of reading by UV lamp was the same as torch light (85%) whereas for Reader II the accuracy was better with UV lamp (87%) than with torch (79%). In reading the fluorescence by UV lamp the crude agreement between the 2 readers was 82% and chance corrected agreement was 64%. UV lamp method appears to be a reliable way of assessing compliance both by medical and paramedical persons whereas torch method appears to be more reliable when used by a medical person than by a paramedical person.
在拥挤的门诊部,评估服药依从性是个难题。使用核黄素作为尿液标志物是一种简单且合理的方法。通过暴露于紫外线(UV)或手电筒光下产生荧光来识别尿液中的核黄素,这种方法在医学实践中虽有应用,但并不广泛。在本研究中,对这些方法的有效性和可靠性进行了评估。紫外线法对I类读者(医务人员)的该测试敏感性和特异性分别为86%和82%,对II类读者(辅助医务人员)分别为82%和94%。对于I类读者,紫外线灯读数的准确性与手电筒光相同(85%),而对于II类读者,紫外线灯的准确性(87%)优于手电筒(79%)。在用紫外线灯读取荧光时,两位读者之间的原始一致性为82%,校正机遇后的一致性为64%。紫外线灯法似乎是医务人员和辅助医务人员评估依从性的可靠方法,而手电筒法由医务人员使用时似乎比辅助医务人员使用时更可靠。