Dale J B, Washburn R G, Marques M B, Wessels M R
VA Medical Center, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.
Infect Immun. 1996 May;64(5):1495-501. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.5.1495-1501.1996.
The major virulence determinant of group A streptococci is the ability to resist opsonization and phagocytic ingestion. The present studies were performed to compare the mechanisms of resistance to opsonization of type 18 and type 24 streptococci and to determine the relative roles of M protein-fibrinogen interaction and the hyaluronate capsule in preventing phagocytic ingestion and killing. By use of parent strains and acapsular transposon mutants in the presence and absence of fibrinogen, we show that type 18 and type 24 streptococci rely on somewhat different mechanisms for resistance to opsonization. Type 24 streptococci bound fibrinogen avidly to their surfaces, and encapsulated organisms were completely resistant to opsonization only in the presence of fibrinogen. In contrast, type 18 streptococci bound 10-fold less fibrinogen than type 24 streptococci and were fully resistant to phagocytosis only when they expressed capsule. The general structural characteristics of the amino-terminal halves of type 18 and type 24 M proteins differed in that type 18 M protein contained only one complete B repeat, whereas type 24 M protein contained five complete B repeats, a structural difference which could potentially be related to the differences in fibrinogen binding between the two serotypes. Immunofluorescence assays of complement deposition were used in combination with 125I-C3 binding assays to show that encapsulated type 24 streptococci were fully resistant to opsonization by C3 only in the presence of plasma. Encapsulated and unencapsulated type 18 streptococci were equally opsonized by C3 in either plasma or serum, yet only encapsulated organisms resisted phagocytic killing in blood. The results of this study indicate that opsonization by C3 does not necessarily lead to phagocytic ingestion and that the hyaluronate capsule and M proteins are variably important in resistance to different group A streptococci to opsonization and phagocytic killing.
A组链球菌的主要毒力决定因素是抵抗调理吞噬作用和吞噬摄取的能力。本研究旨在比较18型和24型链球菌抵抗调理吞噬作用的机制,并确定M蛋白-纤维蛋白原相互作用和透明质酸荚膜在防止吞噬摄取和杀伤中的相对作用。通过在有和没有纤维蛋白原的情况下使用亲本菌株和无荚膜转座子突变体,我们发现18型和24型链球菌对调理吞噬作用的抵抗机制有所不同。24型链球菌将纤维蛋白原大量结合到其表面,并且只有在存在纤维蛋白原的情况下,有荚膜的菌株才对调理吞噬作用完全抵抗。相比之下,18型链球菌结合的纤维蛋白原比24型链球菌少10倍,并且只有在表达荚膜时才对吞噬作用完全抵抗。18型和24型M蛋白氨基末端一半的一般结构特征不同,18型M蛋白仅包含一个完整的B重复序列,而24型M蛋白包含五个完整的B重复序列,这种结构差异可能与两种血清型之间纤维蛋白原结合的差异有关。补体沉积的免疫荧光测定与125I-C3结合测定相结合,以表明有荚膜的24型链球菌仅在血浆存在时才对C3介导 的调理吞噬作用完全抵抗。有荚膜和无荚膜的18型链球菌在血浆或血清中均被C3同等程度地调理,但只有有荚膜的菌株在血液中抵抗吞噬杀伤。本研究结果表明,C3介导的调理吞噬作用不一定导致吞噬摄取,并且透明质酸荚膜和M蛋白在不同A组链球菌抵抗调理吞噬作用和吞噬杀伤中具有不同程度的重要性。