• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式医疗、问责制与医生。

Managed care, accountability, and the physician.

作者信息

Hanchak N A

机构信息

Quality Health Analytics, U.S. Healthcare, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Med Clin North Am. 1996 Mar;80(2):245-61. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70439-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70439-9
PMID:8614172
Abstract

The 1990s is truly the era of increased accountability in the practice of medicine. Through the methods of cost and quality measurement and the introduction of a manager (i.e., the MCO), society as a whole will benefit from a medical delivery system that focuses on linking the outcomes of care delivered to the processes of the care provided. Report cards serve an important tool by which information about quality and costs can be quantified and shared with the purchasers and users of the medical delivery system. Purchasers and patients are asking for greater accountability from payers and providers. The increased accountability of physicians to health plans, IDSs, hospitals, and patients with whom they interact has major implications on the definition of success in the managed medical delivery system of today. The theme of accountability has been described by the examples of the HEDIS Quality Report Card for health plans and Quality Report Cards for hospitals, PCPs, and specialists. Physicians must provide high-quality care to each patient they see but must also develop the mindset and structures to manage an entire population of patients. The expectations of each of the entities with whom they interact must be understood, and physicians need to develop the skills and infrastructure to put total quality management and information technology to work to help them facilitate the delivery of high-quality care in a cost-effective manner. Everyone involved in the health care system--from purchasers to payers to consumers--shares the same goals as physicians: provide the highest-quality care and achieve the best possible outcomes in the most cost-effective manner.

摘要

20世纪90年代确实是医学实践中问责制增强的时代。通过成本和质量衡量方法以及引入管理者(即管理式医疗组织),整个社会将从一个专注于将所提供护理的结果与所提供护理的过程相联系的医疗服务系统中受益。成绩单是一种重要工具,通过它可以量化有关质量和成本的信息,并与医疗服务系统的购买者和使用者分享。购买者和患者要求付款方和提供者承担更大的责任。医生对他们所互动的健康计划、综合医疗服务机构、医院和患者的责任增加,对当今管理式医疗服务系统中成功的定义具有重大影响。问责制的主题通过健康计划的HEDIS质量成绩单以及医院、初级保健医生和专科医生的质量成绩单的例子得到了体现。医生必须为他们所诊治的每一位患者提供高质量的护理,但还必须培养管理整个人口患者的思维模式和结构。必须了解他们所互动的每个实体的期望,医生需要发展技能和基础设施,以使全面质量管理和信息技术发挥作用,帮助他们以具有成本效益的方式促进高质量护理的提供。医疗保健系统中的每一个人——从购买者到付款方再到消费者——都与医生有着相同的目标:以最具成本效益的方式提供最高质量的护理并实现尽可能好的结果。

相似文献

1
Managed care, accountability, and the physician.管理式医疗、问责制与医生。
Med Clin North Am. 1996 Mar;80(2):245-61. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70439-9.
2
Accountability for quality in managed care.管理式医疗中的质量问责制。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Dec;24(12):711-25. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30417-5.
3
HEDIS 3.0 advances health plan accountability.医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)3.0提升了健康计划的问责制。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 May;51(5):48, 50, 52.
4
Preserving community in health care.在医疗保健中维护社区。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Feb;22(1):147-84. doi: 10.1215/03616878-22-1-147.
5
The new organization of the health care delivery system.医疗服务提供系统的新组织形式。
Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:101-48.
6
Purchasers and the impact of managed care on physicians.购买者以及管理式医疗对医生的影响。
Physician Exec. 1998 Jan-Feb;24(1):30-8.
7
Report on financing the new model of family medicine.关于新型家庭医学模式融资的报告。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Dec 2;2 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1-21. doi: 10.1370/afm.237.
8
Quality measurement for health systems: accreditation and report cards.卫生系统的质量评估:认证与成绩单
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 Jul 1;54(13):1528-35. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/54.13.1528.
9
Nutrition measures for managed care report cards.管理式医疗报告卡的营养措施
J Am Diet Assoc. 1996 Apr;96(4):374-80. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(96)00102-2.
10
Managed care: past, present, and future.管理式医疗:过去、现在与未来。
Med Clin North Am. 1996 Mar;80(2):225-44. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70438-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of textual elements on the comprehensibility of drug label instructions (DLIs): A systematic review.文本元素对药品标签说明书(DLIs)理解度的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0250238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250238. eCollection 2021.
2
Trends in publications regarding evidence-practice gaps: a literature review.关于证据实践差距的出版物趋势:文献综述。
Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 3;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-11.
3
U.S. Healthcare's quality-based compensation model.美国医疗保健的基于质量的薪酬模式。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Spring;17(3):143-59.