Suppr超能文献

常规血培养对临床诊断为医院获得性肺炎的患者评估是否有效?

Are routine blood cultures effective in the evaluation of patients clinically diagnosed to have nosocomial pneumonia?

作者信息

Chendrasekhar A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1996 May;62(5):373-6.

PMID:8615565
Abstract

Blood cultures are a routine part of the evaluation of patients with clinically diagnosed nosocomial pneumonia; however, their utility has not been proven. We performed a retrospective chart review of 77 consecutive trauma patients diagnosed clinically to have nosocomial pneumonia at our level 1 trauma intensive care unit. Routine blood cultures did not alter the therapy of patients clinically diagnosed to have nosocomial pneumonia. We found the incidence of gram negative pneumonia was 71.4 per cent (55/77 patients) and gram positive pneumonia was 40.3 per cent (31/77 patients). Routine blood cultures taken at the time of diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia fail to alter therapy.

摘要

血培养是对临床诊断为医院获得性肺炎患者进行评估的常规部分;然而,其效用尚未得到证实。我们对在我们的一级创伤重症监护病房临床诊断为医院获得性肺炎的77例连续创伤患者进行了回顾性病历审查。常规血培养并未改变临床诊断为医院获得性肺炎患者的治疗方案。我们发现革兰氏阴性菌肺炎的发生率为71.4%(55/77例患者),革兰氏阳性菌肺炎的发生率为40.3%(31/77例患者)。在诊断医院获得性肺炎时进行的常规血培养未能改变治疗方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验