Rattner D W, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Brugge W R, Warshaw A L
Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass., USA.
Arch Surg. 1996 Apr;131(4):366-71. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430160024003.
To delineate factors determined preoperatively, which predict successful local resection of ampullary neoplasms.
Retrospective review of case series of the author's experience from 1988 through 1995. The median follow-up of patients with malignancies was 29 months.
Tertiary care university teaching hospital.
Twenty-seven patients underwent surgery. The decision to perform either an ampullectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was based on the size of the lesion, the presence of a "field defect" (ie, familial polyposis), depth of invasion determined by preoperative endoscopic ultrasound, and extent of pancreatic and bile duct involvement seen on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Fourteen patients underwent ampullectomy, 12 patients underwent PD, and one patient had a retroperitoneal node biopsy performed without resection of the primary tumor.
Resectability, morbidity, and mortality.
Depth of invasion was accurately determined in nine of 12 patients studied by preoperative endoscopic ultrasound. Preoperative endoscopic biopsy specimens were obtained in 21 patients and were inaccurate in seven of 21 cases. The length of stay following local resection was 10.5 +/- 3.7 days vs 15.4 +/- 5.8 days following PD (P=.02). One patient died following PD, and there were no deaths following ampullectomy. Six of 12 patients undergoing PD had postoperative complications vs two of 14 patients undergoing local resection.
Ampullectomy is the procedure of choice for resecting benign lesions smaller than 3 cm, small neuroendocrine tumors, and T1 carcinomas of the ampulla. While endoscopic ultrasonography is helpful in identifying stage T1 lesions suitable for local resection, no preoperative test proved accurate enough to substitute for clinical judgment and intraoperative pathological confirmation.
明确术前确定的可预测壶腹肿瘤局部切除成功的因素。
回顾性分析作者1988年至1995年的病例系列经验。恶性肿瘤患者的中位随访时间为29个月。
三级医疗大学教学医院。
27例患者接受了手术。行壶腹切除术或胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的决定基于病变大小、“区域缺损”(即家族性息肉病)的存在、术前内镜超声确定的浸润深度以及内镜逆行胰胆管造影所见的胰腺和胆管受累范围。
14例患者接受了壶腹切除术,12例患者接受了PD,1例患者进行了腹膜后淋巴结活检,未切除原发肿瘤。
可切除性、发病率和死亡率。
12例接受术前内镜超声检查的患者中有9例浸润深度得以准确确定。21例患者获得了术前内镜活检标本,其中21例中有7例不准确。局部切除后的住院时间为10.5±3.7天,而PD后的住院时间为15.4±5.8天(P = 0.02)。1例患者在PD后死亡,壶腹切除术后无死亡病例。12例接受PD的患者中有6例出现术后并发症,而14例接受局部切除的患者中有2例出现并发症。
壶腹切除术是切除小于3 cm的良性病变、小神经内分泌肿瘤和壶腹T1期癌的首选术式。虽然内镜超声有助于识别适合局部切除的T1期病变,但没有术前检查被证明足够准确,可替代临床判断和术中病理确认。