Barr D A, Schmid R
Stanford Center for Organizations Research, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, California, USA.
Acad Med. 1996 Feb;71(2):141-5. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199602000-00016.
After World War I, medical education in the Soviet Union and medical education in the United States headed in strikingly divergent directions. In keeping with the recommendations of the Flexner report, medical education in the United States became a university-based academic discipline based in the natural sciences. In contrast, the Soviet Union created a series of free-standing medical institutes whose admission, curricular, and pedagogic policies were centrally controlled in strict conformity with political doctrine. Notable features of the Soviet system were narrowly defined professional education; early specialization, beginning in the first year of medical school; and emphasis on empirical clinical training at the expense of scientifically based education. Despite the historical differences between Soviet and American medical education, there are several issues that face present-day medical educators in both the United States and the Soviet successor states. These include an overabundance of specialists, the need to provide equitable professional opportunities for physicians of both sexes, and the need to provide access to medical education for qualified candidates from underrepresented social or ethnic groups or from geographically remote regions.
第一次世界大战后,苏联的医学教育和美国的医学教育朝着截然不同的方向发展。按照《弗莱克斯纳报告》的建议,美国的医学教育成为了一门以自然科学为基础、依托大学的学科。相比之下,苏联创建了一系列独立的医学院,其招生、课程和教学政策都由中央严格按照政治教义进行控制。苏联体系的显著特点是专业教育定义狭窄;从医学院第一年就开始早期专业化;强调以经验为主的临床培训,而忽视基于科学的教育。尽管苏联和美国的医学教育存在历史差异,但美国和苏联继承国的当代医学教育工作者都面临着几个问题。这些问题包括专科医生过剩、需要为男女医生提供公平的职业机会,以及需要为来自社会或种族代表性不足群体或地理偏远地区的合格候选人提供医学教育机会。