Brandes D A, Wilson S, Preisch J W, Casamassimo P S
Department of Dentistry, Columbus Children's Hospital, OH 43205, USA.
Spec Care Dentist. 1995 May-Jun;15(3):119-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1995.tb00493.x.
The purposes of this study were to compare the acceptance of pediatric dental behavioral management techniques by 40 parents of children with disabilities with that of 40 parents whose children were not disabled and to determine the effect of prior information on the level of acceptance for both groups of parents. An instrument containing a demographic questionnaire and using a visual analog scale asked parents to indicate acceptance level of hand-over mouth, sedation, restraint using Papoose board, and general anesthesia for either a check-up/cleaning, dental filling, or treatment of a toothache. One half of each parent group received a written description and rationale for the behavior management technique prior to rating acceptance, and the other half did not. Although differences were found between parents of the disabled and non-disabled and between those informed and not informed, only one technique and procedure (restraint for check-up/cleaning) was significantly different for acceptability (p < or = 0.05), and that was between uninformed parents of non-disabled children and informed parents of disabled children. We conclude that having a disabled child or receiving a prior rational for pediatric behavior management techniques was not significantly related to differences in acceptance of the techniques for the procedures described.
本研究的目的是比较40名残疾儿童的家长与40名非残疾儿童的家长对儿童牙科行为管理技术的接受程度，并确定预先提供信息对两组家长接受程度的影响。一份包含人口统计学调查问卷并使用视觉模拟量表的工具，要求家长表明对用于检查/清洁、补牙或治疗牙痛的口对口、镇静、使用肢体固定板约束和全身麻醉等行为管理技术的接受程度。每组家长中有一半在对接受程度进行评分之前收到了行为管理技术的书面描述和原理说明，另一半则没有。尽管在残疾儿童家长和非残疾儿童家长之间以及知情家长和不知情家长之间发现了差异，但只有一种技术和程序（检查/清洁时的约束）在可接受性方面存在显著差异（p≤0.05），即非残疾儿童的不知情家长与残疾儿童的知情家长之间存在差异。我们得出结论，孩子是否残疾或是否收到儿科行为管理技术的预先原理说明，与对所描述程序的技术接受程度差异没有显著关系。
