Ismail Norsaima, Isa Khairil Anuar Md, Hamzah Siti Hajar, Mokhtar Ilham Wan
Centre for Paediatric Dentistry & Orthodontics Studies, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh Campus, Jalan Hospital, Selangor, Malaysia.
Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2023 Dec 27;13(6):500-508. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_52_23. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.
To compare caregivers' acceptance, consent, and concern toward utilization of a combination of basic behavior guidance technique (CBBGT) and Papoose Board (PB) for their special needs children and to evaluate the impact of PB usage on the caregiver's attitude and the association between their education level, monthly household income, and previous dental experience.
This cross-over study incorporated 90 special needs children who were recruited to receive dental treatment with two ways of behavior guidance exposures consecutively in the order of A-B/B-A design. Exposure A is CBBGT (distraction, tell-show-do, and positive reinforcement), while Exposure B is PB. The dental procedures were either dental prophylaxis or restoration with a handpiece. Caregivers need to answer a paper-based questionnaire before and after exposure. The Wilcoxon sign rank test and logistic regression were utilized in order to establish the comparability, impacts, and association.
About 88 caregivers of special needs children aged between 2 and 15 years completed the sequence. Overall, 98.9% of the children presented with neurodevelopmental disorders. Twenty-seven caregivers were significantly concerned when the combination of basic BGT was applied to their children, and 14 caregivers felt the same for PB. However, the Wilcoxon sign rank test revealed insignificant caregiver scores on acceptance and consent for both methods but significantly improved attitudes towards the use of PB after observing the placement of their children.
The studied caregiver demonstrated equivalent acceptance, consent, and concern toward the use of PB and a combination of basic BGT with improved attitudes after comprehensive explanation and real-time observation of PB usage during their children's dental treatment.
比较照顾者对其特殊需求儿童使用基本行为指导技术组合(CBBGT)和小儿束缚板(PB)的接受度、同意度和关注度,并评估使用PB对照顾者态度的影响以及他们的教育水平、家庭月收入与既往牙科经历之间的关联。
本交叉研究纳入了90名特殊需求儿童,他们按A - B/B - A设计的顺序连续接受两种行为指导方式以接受牙科治疗。暴露A为CBBGT(分散注意力、示范 - 讲解 - 操作和积极强化),而暴露B为PB。牙科程序为使用牙钻进行牙齿预防或修复。照顾者需要在暴露前后回答纸质问卷。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和逻辑回归来确定可比性、影响和关联。
约88名年龄在2至15岁的特殊需求儿童的照顾者完成了该序列。总体而言,98.9%的儿童患有神经发育障碍。当基本行为指导技术组合应用于他们的孩子时,27名照顾者表示非常担心,14名照顾者对PB也有同样的感受。然而,Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示,两种方法在照顾者的接受度和同意度得分上无显著差异,但在观察到孩子放置情况后,对使用PB的态度有显著改善。
在对照顾者进行关于PB使用的全面解释和实时观察后,本研究中的照顾者对使用PB以及基本行为指导技术组合表现出同等的接受度、同意度和关注度,且态度有所改善,这些照顾者的孩子正在接受牙科治疗。