Suppr超能文献

致癌性筛查的假阳性率和假阴性率。

False-positive and false-negative rates for carcinogenicity screens.

作者信息

Fears T R, Tarone R E, Chu K C

出版信息

Cancer Res. 1977 Jul;37(7 Pt 1):1941-5.

PMID:861930
Abstract

The implementation of a number of chemical carcinogen screening programs has been accompanied by the observation that some screens might have high false-positive error rates. With designs presently used at the National Cancer Institute and historical spontaneous tumor rates based upon control animals in previous experiments, we compute upper bounds on the false-positive error rates for several screening strategies. False-positive results are much less likely to occur at tissue sites with low spontaneous tumor rates; hence the site at which a significant tumor increase occurs is important. There is danger in relying solely upon the finding of statistical significance without incorporating biological knowledge and corroborative evidence such as the presence of a dose-response relationship or experimentally consistent results in different species or sexes. A report by the National Cancer Institute Carcinogenesis Program demonstrates these concepts.

摘要

一些化学致癌物筛查项目的实施伴随着这样的观察结果

某些筛查可能具有较高的假阳性错误率。根据美国国立癌症研究所目前使用的设计以及以往实验中基于对照动物的历史自发肿瘤发生率,我们计算了几种筛查策略的假阳性错误率上限。在自发肿瘤发生率较低的组织部位,假阳性结果不太可能出现;因此,出现显著肿瘤增加的部位很重要。仅依靠统计学显著性的发现而不纳入生物学知识和确证证据(如剂量反应关系的存在或不同物种或性别的实验一致结果)是有风险的。美国国立癌症研究所致癌作用项目的一份报告证明了这些概念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验