• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术。从连续240例患者中吸取的经验教训。

Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. Lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients.

作者信息

Lumley J W, Fielding G A, Rhodes M, Nathanson L K, Siu S, Stitz R W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Australia.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Feb;39(2):155-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02068069.

DOI:10.1007/BF02068069
PMID:8620781
Abstract

PURPOSE

To audit the development and outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the Royal Brisbane Hospital.

METHODS

Since July 1991, laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for benign and malignant colorectal disease has been performed on more than 300 patients at the Royal Brisbane Hospital. This paper summarizes the outcome for the first 240 patients who underwent a laparoscopic colorectal procedure. All laparoscopic data were collected prospectively, and for selected studies, data were compared with open surgical controls.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients required open conversion (7.9 percent). There was a significant decrease in wound infection rates in patients having a laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (3.6 percent) compared with historical controls (7.9 percent) (P < 0.05; chi-squared). There were five anastomotic leaks, five laparotomies for postoperative adhesive obstruction, and four perioperative deaths. A total of 103 patients had a procedure for colorectal cancer. Of the 79 potentially curative procedures, there have been 5 (6.3 percent) recurrences to date.

CONCLUSION

The overall morbidity and mortality in this series seem to be acceptable compared with that of open procedures.

摘要

目的

评估皇家布里斯班医院腹腔镜结直肠手术的开展情况及治疗效果。

方法

自1991年7月起,皇家布里斯班医院已为300多名患有良性和恶性结直肠疾病的患者实施了腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术。本文总结了前240例接受腹腔镜结直肠手术患者的治疗结果。所有腹腔镜手术数据均为前瞻性收集,对于部分研究,将数据与开放手术对照组进行了比较。

结果

19例患者需要转为开放手术(7.9%)。与历史对照组(7.9%)相比,接受腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术的患者伤口感染率显著降低(3.6%)(P<0.05;卡方检验)。发生了5例吻合口漏、5例因术后粘连性肠梗阻行剖腹手术以及4例围手术期死亡。共有103例患者接受了结直肠癌手术。在79例可能治愈的手术中,迄今为止有5例(6.3%)复发。

结论

与开放手术相比,本系列手术的总体发病率和死亡率似乎是可以接受的。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. Lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients.腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术。从连续240例患者中吸取的经验教训。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Feb;39(2):155-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02068069.
2
Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: risk of postoperative leakage. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG).腹腔镜结直肠吻合术:术后渗漏风险。一项多中心研究的结果。腹腔镜结直肠手术研究组(LCSSG)。
Surg Endosc. 1999 Jul;13(7):639-44. doi: 10.1007/s004649901064.
3
Single-Site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared With Standard Laparoscopic Surgery: An Analysis of 626 Patients.单部位腹腔镜结直肠手术与标准腹腔镜手术相比临床结局相似:626例患者的分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Sep;58(9):862-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000435.
4
A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.一项基于人群的比较结直肠手术中腹腔镜手术与机器人手术结果的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):455-463. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4218-6. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
5
Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.腹腔镜结直肠手术中转开腹的后果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Feb;49(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0258-7.
6
Primary Outcome of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections in a Northern Finnish Hospital: A Single Center Study.腹腔镜结直肠切除术在芬兰北部一家医院的主要结果:一项单中心研究。
Scand J Surg. 2019 Jun;108(2):137-143. doi: 10.1177/1457496918798196. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection.腹腔镜结直肠切除术的结果
Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9267-y. Epub 2004 Feb 2.
8
Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.开腹、腹腔镜及机器人辅助全腹结肠切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2792-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4552-8. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
9
[Is age a risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?].[年龄是腹腔镜结直肠手术的危险因素吗?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2011 Jun;136(3):264-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262540. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
10
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis of the first 237 cases.腹腔镜结直肠手术。对最初237例病例的分析。
Acta Chir Belg. 2001 Jan-Feb;101(1):25-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopy for Colon Cancer.用于结肠癌的腹腔镜检查
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Apr;30(2):99-103. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597317.
2
Minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis.憩室炎的微创手术。
Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Feb;17 Suppl 1:S11-22. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0940-4. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
3
Optimal port site placement.最佳的端口位置选择。
Tech Coloproctol. 2010 Sep;14(3):273-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-010-0595-y. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
4
Laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer: an evidence-based review.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1063-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9172-x. Epub 2007 May 5.
5
Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for chronic diverticular disease.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗慢性憩室病
JSLS. 2005 Oct-Dec;9(4):382-5.
6
Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates.腹腔镜结肠癌切除术治疗结肠腺癌:一项11年回顾性研究及5年生存率分析
Surg Endosc. 2005 May;19(5):643-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8921-y. Epub 2005 Mar 28.
7
Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).腹腔镜结肠癌切除术:欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)共识
Surg Endosc. 2004 Aug;18(8):1163-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8253-3. Epub 2004 Jun 23.
8
Elective laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease: results of a multicenter study in 179 patients.择期腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗憩室病:179例患者的多中心研究结果
Surg Endosc. 2002 Sep;16(9):1320-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9236-x. Epub 2002 May 3.
9
Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarians.八旬老人的腹腔镜结直肠切除术
Surg Endosc. 2001 Aug;15(8):802-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-0017-3. Epub 2001 May 11.
10
Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages?腹腔镜全腹结肠切除术和直肠结肠切除术有优势吗?
Surg Endosc. 2001 Aug;15(8):837-42. doi: 10.1007/s004640000356. Epub 2001 May 7.