Weis N, Lind I
Neisseria Department, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Epidemiol Infect. 1996 Apr;116(2):103-14. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800052328.
The objective of the study was to assess whether genotypic characterization by means of DNA-fingerprinting pattern (DFP) and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MEE) profile as compared to phenotypic characterization would improve the differentiation of Neisseria meningitidis strains associated with outbreaks from strains associated with sporadic cases of meningococcal disease. In addition, the differentiation of serogroup C carrier strains from those associated with an outbreak of serogroup C meningococcal disease was investigated. A total of 118 N. meningitidis strains were available for the study: 59 from patients involved in outbreaks of meningococcal disease (2 serogroup B and 2 serogroup C), 37 patients considered to be sporadic cases and 22 serogroup C carrier strains. Among the 59 strains from patients involved in outbreaks the 4 strains isolated from the patient registered as the first in each outbreak were designated the index strains. Among the remaining 55 outbreak strains 52 were either DFP-identical or DFP-indistinguishable when compared with the one relevant out of the 4 index strains. This was only the case for 17 of the 37 strains isolated from sporadic cases caused by the same serogroup of meningococci during the outbreak periods, and 5 of the 22 meningococcal strains isolated from healthy carriers. Among the 56 (52 + 4) DFP-identical or DFP-indistinguishable outbreak strains 5 different electrophoretic types were identified by MEE. Among 59 assumed outbreak strains a total of 4 were identified as genotypically distinct. Among the 37 mainly DFP-indistinguishable or DFP-different strains from sporadic cases 17 different ETs were identified, and among the 22 mainly DFP-different carrier strains 13 different ETs were identified. Two strains among those selected from sporadic cases were identical to the outbreak strain. None of the local serogroup C carrier strains isolated during the outbreak of serogroup C disease were identical to the outbreak strain. Both DNA-fingerprinting and MEE improved the differentiation of meningococci when compared with phenotypic characterization. The results indicate that tracing a virulent strain within a open group of contacts is irrelevant.
本研究的目的是评估与表型特征相比,通过DNA指纹图谱模式(DFP)和多位点酶电泳(MEE)谱进行基因型特征分析是否能更好地区分与脑膜炎球菌病暴发相关的脑膜炎奈瑟菌菌株和与散发病例相关的菌株。此外,还研究了C群携带者菌株与C群脑膜炎球菌病暴发相关菌株的鉴别。共有118株脑膜炎奈瑟菌用于该研究:59株来自脑膜炎球菌病暴发患者(2株B群和2株C群),37例被认为是散发病例的患者,以及22株C群携带者菌株。在59株来自暴发患者的菌株中,从每次暴发中登记为首例患者分离出的4株菌株被指定为索引菌株。在其余55株暴发菌株中,与4株索引菌株中相关的一株相比,52株在DFP上相同或无法区分。在暴发期间由同一血清群脑膜炎球菌引起的散发病例分离出的37株菌株中,只有17株是这种情况,从健康携带者分离出的22株脑膜炎球菌菌株中有5株是这种情况。在56株(52 + 4)DFP相同或无法区分的暴发菌株中,通过MEE鉴定出5种不同的电泳类型。在59株假定的暴发菌株中,共有4株被鉴定为基因型不同。在37株主要DFP无法区分或不同的散发病例菌株中,鉴定出17种不同的ETs,在22株主要DFP不同的携带者菌株中,鉴定出13种不同的ETs。从散发病例中选出的2株菌株与暴发菌株相同。在C群疾病暴发期间分离出的本地C群携带者菌株中,没有一株与暴发菌株相同。与表型特征相比,DNA指纹图谱和MEE都改善了脑膜炎球菌的鉴别。结果表明,在一组开放的接触者中追踪一株毒力菌株是无关紧要的。