Zhang Y, Chernova M N, Stuart-Tilley A K, Jiang L, Alper S L
Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
J Biol Chem. 1996 Mar 8;271(10):5741-9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.10.5741.
We have compared regulation by pH of AE1 (band 3)- and AE2-mediated 36Cl- uptake into Xenopus oocytes. 36Cl- influx was assayed at varying extracellular pH (pHo) values between 9.0 and 5.0 under conditions in which corresponding intracellular pH (pHi) values were at or near steady-state. Wild type (WT) AE1 displayed a broad convex pH versus activity curve, with peak activity at pHo 7.0 and 63% of maximal activity at pHo 5.0. In contrast, WT AE2 displayed a steep pH versus activity curve, with peak activity at pHo9.0 and full suppression at pHo 5.0. The structural basis of these differing pH sensitivities was examined by expression of cRNAs encoding chimeric and truncated proteins. Mutant polypeptides were expressed in oocytes and detected at the cell surface. The AE2cyto/AE1memb polypeptide displayed a broad pH versus activity curve similar to that of WT AE1. In contrast, the AE1cyto/AE2memb polypeptide displayed a steep pH versus activity curve, which was shifted toward acid pH values from that of WT AE2 by 0.69 +/- 0.04 pHo units. Moreover, whereas the pH versus activity curves of AE2 Delta99 and WT AE2 were indistinguishable, AE2 Delta510 exhibited a pH versus activity curve acid-shifted from that of WT AE2 by 0.66 +/- 0.13 pHo units (indistinguishable from that of AE1cyto/AE2memb). The data suggest that a pH sensor resides within the transmembrane region of AE2. The affinity for protons of this pH sensor is influenced by a modifier site located between residues 99 and 510 of the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain of AE2. Acidification of oocytes with acetate suggested that pHi accounted for some but not all of the measured pH dependence of AE2.
我们比较了pH对非洲爪蟾卵母细胞中AE1(带3)和AE2介导的³⁶Cl⁻摄取的调节作用。在相应细胞内pH(pHi)值处于或接近稳态的条件下,于9.0至5.0的不同细胞外pH(pHo)值下测定³⁶Cl⁻内流。野生型(WT)AE1呈现出一条宽泛的凸形pH与活性曲线,在pHo 7.0时活性峰值最高,在pHo 5.0时为最大活性的63%。相比之下,WT AE2呈现出一条陡峭的pH与活性曲线,在pHo 9.0时活性峰值最高,在pHo 5.0时完全被抑制。通过表达编码嵌合蛋白和截短蛋白的cRNA来研究这些不同pH敏感性的结构基础。突变多肽在卵母细胞中表达并在细胞表面检测到。AE2胞质/AE1膜多肽呈现出一条与WT AE1相似的宽泛pH与活性曲线。相比之下,AE1胞质/AE2膜多肽呈现出一条陡峭的pH与活性曲线,相对于WT AE2,其向酸性pH值方向偏移了0.69±0.04 pHo单位。此外,虽然AE2 Δ99和WT AE2的pH与活性曲线无法区分,但AE2 Δ510呈现出一条相对于WT AE2向酸性偏移0.66±0.13 pHo单位的pH与活性曲线(与AE1胞质/AE2膜多肽的曲线无法区分)。数据表明,pH传感器位于AE₂的跨膜区域内。该pH传感器对质子的亲和力受位于AE2 N端胞质结构域第99位和第510位残基之间的一个修饰位点影响。用乙酸对卵母细胞进行酸化表明,pHi对AE2所测pH依赖性有部分但非全部影响。