Suppr超能文献

西替利嗪、氯雷他定和安慰剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效、起效时间、作用持续时间及安全性的户外对照研究。

Comparative outdoor study of the efficacy, onset and duration of action, and safety of cetirizine, loratadine, and placebo for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Meltzer E O, Weiler J M, Widlitz M D

机构信息

Allergy and Asthma Medical Group and Research Center, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996 Feb;97(2):617-26. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)70307-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cetirizine, a new once-daily highly specific H1-antagonist, has been shown in conventional studies to be efficacious in the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy, duration and onset of action, and safety of cetirizine, 10 mg once daily, was compared with that of loratadine, 10 mg once daily, and placebo in a field study of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, double-dummy study conducted over 2 days in spring allergy season at outdoor parks in San Diego and Iowa City. Study medication was administered at 10:00 AM on both days. After screening, eligible patients completed rhinitis symptom diaries in the park hourly from 7:30 to 9:30 AM (baseline); at 10:30 AM and hourly from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM (period I); at 6:00, 8:00, and 10:00 PM at home (period II); and the next day in the park hourly from 8:00 to 10:00 AM (period III), and from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM (period IV). Major and total symptom complex scores, global efficacy and overall satisfaction, and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 279 patients (140 men and 139 women; mean age, 29 years) randomized to treatment, 278 were included in the efficacy analysis. Cetirizine produced significantly greater mean reductions than loratadine or placebo in major symptom complex severity scores at all periods (p < or = 0.05), except period I for placebo. Cetirizine also produced mean reductions in total symptom complex severity scores that were superior to loratadine at every evaluation period (p < 0.05) and were statistically different from placebo at period II (p < 0.01). A rapid onset of action was observed with cetirizine, as was a better response pattern in the patient global assessment of efficacy compared with loratadine. Study medications were well tolerated; no patient stopped treatment because of side effects. The incidence of somnolence with cetirizine was 13% versus 2% with placebo (p < 0.05); headache occurred more frequently with loratadine (23%) than with cetirizine (11%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Cetirizine relieved rhinitis symptoms more effectively and quickly than loratadine and placebo in this field study of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Both active agents were generally well tolerated.

摘要

背景

西替利嗪是一种新型的每日一次服用的高特异性H1拮抗剂,传统研究表明其对季节性和常年性过敏性鼻炎以及慢性特发性荨麻疹的治疗有效。

目的

在一项针对季节性过敏性鼻炎患者的现场研究中,比较每日一次服用10mg西替利嗪与每日一次服用10mg氯雷他定及安慰剂的疗效、作用持续时间和起效时间以及安全性。

方法

这是一项随机、双盲、平行、双模拟研究,于春季过敏季节在圣地亚哥和爱荷华市的户外公园进行,为期2天。两天均于上午10:00服用研究药物。筛选后,符合条件的患者在公园从上午7:30至9:30每小时填写鼻炎症状日记(基线);上午10:30以及从上午11:00至下午4:00每小时填写(第一阶段);在家于下午6:00、8:00和10:00填写(第二阶段);第二天在公园从上午8:00至10:00每小时填写(第三阶段),以及从上午11:00至下午4:00填写(第四阶段)。评估主要和总症状复合体评分、总体疗效和总体满意度以及不良事件。

结果

随机接受治疗的279例患者(140例男性和139例女性;平均年龄29岁)中,278例纳入疗效分析。在所有阶段,西替利嗪使主要症状复合体严重程度评分的平均降低幅度显著大于氯雷他定或安慰剂(p≤0.05),安慰剂在第一阶段除外。在每个评估阶段,西替利嗪使总症状复合体严重程度评分的平均降低幅度也优于氯雷他定(p<0.05),且在第二阶段与安慰剂有统计学差异(p<0.01)。观察到西替利嗪起效迅速,与氯雷他定相比,患者对疗效的总体评估中反应模式更好。研究药物耐受性良好;没有患者因副作用而停止治疗。西替利嗪导致嗜睡的发生率为13%,而安慰剂为2%(p<0.05);氯雷他定导致头痛的发生率(23%)高于西替利嗪(11%,p=0.03)。

结论

在这项季节性过敏性鼻炎的现场研究中,西替利嗪比氯雷他定和安慰剂更有效、更快地缓解鼻炎症状。两种活性药物总体耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验