• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西替利嗪、氯雷他定或安慰剂用于季节性变应性鼻炎患者:在环境暴露舱中进行豚草花粉激发试验后的效果

Cetirizine, loratadine, or placebo in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: effects after controlled ragweed pollen challenge in an environmental exposure unit.

作者信息

Day J H, Briscoe M, Widlitz M D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 May;101(5):638-45. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70172-1.

DOI:10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70172-1
PMID:9600501
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis affects nearly one in 10 Americans. Cetirizine is a newer once-daily selective H1-antagonist. In traditional clinical trials, cetirizine has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.

OBJECTIVE

To better characterize the efficacy and onset of action of cetirizine in a more controlled but clinically relevant setting, this agent was compared with loratadine and placebo in patients with symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis undergoing controlled pollen challenge in an environmental exposure unit (EEU).

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. After screening, patients were exposed to ragweed pollen (primed) in the EEU (up to six exposures), and those with qualifying symptom scores were randomized to controlled pollen exposure (two periods of 5.5 to 6.5 hours over 2 days) and once-daily treatment with 10 mg cetirizine (n = 67), 10 mg loratadine (n = 67), or placebo (n = 68). The mean ragweed pollen level was 3480 +/- 350 grains/m3 (standard deviation). The primary efficacy variables were the total symptom complex (TSC) and the major symptom complex (MSC) scores. Symptoms were evaluated every half hour in the EEU throughout the study.

RESULTS

Cetirizine produced a 36.7% mean reduction in TSC scores overall versus 15.4% with loratadine and 12.0% with placebo (p < or = 0.01). Cetirizine also produced a 37.4% mean reduction in MSC scores overall versus 14.7% with loratadine and 6.7% with placebo (p < or = 0.01). Onset of action as assessed by reductions in TSC and MSC scores versus placebo was evident within 1 hour with cetirizine (p < or = 0.02) and 3 hours with loratadine (p < or = 0.03). The incidence of treatment-related side effects was similar among groups, with headache reported most commonly in each group.

CONCLUSION

Cetirizine is well tolerated and effective in reducing symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in patients undergoing controlled pollen challenge.

摘要

背景

过敏性鼻炎影响着近十分之一的美国人。西替利嗪是一种新型的每日一次服用的选择性H1拮抗剂。在传统的临床试验中,西替利嗪已被证明对治疗季节性和常年性过敏性鼻炎以及慢性特发性荨麻疹是安全有效的。

目的

为了在更可控但临床相关的环境中更好地描述西替利嗪的疗效和起效情况,将该药物与氯雷他定和安慰剂在环境暴露单元(EEU)中接受受控花粉激发试验的有症状季节性过敏性鼻炎患者中进行比较。

方法

这是一项双盲、随机、平行组研究。筛选后,患者在EEU中暴露于豚草花粉(预先致敏)(最多6次暴露),那些症状评分符合条件的患者被随机分配接受受控花粉暴露(2天内两个时间段,每次5.5至6.5小时),并每日一次服用10毫克西替利嗪(n = 67)、10毫克氯雷他定(n = 67)或安慰剂(n = 68)。豚草花粉的平均水平为3480±350粒/立方米(标准差)。主要疗效变量是总症状复合体(TSC)和主要症状复合体(MSC)评分。在整个研究过程中,在EEU中每半小时评估一次症状。

结果

西替利嗪使TSC评分总体平均降低36.7%,而氯雷他定为15.4%,安慰剂为12.0%(p≤0.01)。西替利嗪还使MSC评分总体平均降低37.4%,而氯雷他定为14.7%,安慰剂为6.7%(p≤0.01)。以西替利嗪治疗后TSC和MSC评分相对于安慰剂的降低来评估,其起效在1小时内明显(p≤0.02),氯雷他定则在3小时内明显(p≤0.03)。各治疗组中与治疗相关的副作用发生率相似,每组中最常报告的是头痛。

结论

在接受受控花粉激发试验的患者中,西替利嗪耐受性良好且能有效减轻季节性过敏性鼻炎的症状。

相似文献

1
Cetirizine, loratadine, or placebo in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: effects after controlled ragweed pollen challenge in an environmental exposure unit.西替利嗪、氯雷他定或安慰剂用于季节性变应性鼻炎患者:在环境暴露舱中进行豚草花粉激发试验后的效果
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 May;101(5):638-45. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70172-1.
2
Comparative onset of action and symptom relief with cetirizine, loratadine, or placebo in an environmental exposure unit in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: confirmation of a test system.在季节性变应性鼻炎患者的环境暴露单元中,比较西替利嗪、氯雷他定或安慰剂的起效时间和症状缓解情况:验证一个测试系统。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Dec;87(6):474-81. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62260-0.
3
Comparative study of cetirizine and terfenadine versus placebo in the symptomatic management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.西替利嗪和特非那定与安慰剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎症状的对比研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 May;76(5):448-54. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63462-X.
4
Onset of action and efficacy of terfenadine, astemizole, cetirizine, and loratadine for the relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis.特非那定、阿司咪唑、西替利嗪和氯雷他定缓解变应性鼻炎症状的起效时间和疗效。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Aug;79(2):163-72. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63104-3.
5
Randomized double-blind comparison of cetirizine and fexofenadine after pollen challenge in the Environmental Exposure Unit: duration of effect in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis.在环境暴露单元中花粉激发后西替利嗪和非索非那定的随机双盲比较:对季节性变应性鼻炎患者的疗效持续时间
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2004 Jan-Feb;25(1):59-68.
6
Loratadine versus cetirizine: assessment of somnolence and motivation during the workday.氯雷他定与西替利嗪对比:工作日嗜睡及动力评估
Clin Ther. 2000 May;22(5):573-82. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)80045-4.
7
Comparison of efficacy, safety, and skin test inhibition of cetirizine and astemizole.西替利嗪和阿司咪唑的疗效、安全性及皮肤试验抑制作用比较。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 Apr;76(4):363-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60039-7.
8
Onset-of-action for antihistamine and decongestant combinations during an outdoor challenge.户外激发试验中抗组胺药和解充血药组合的起效时间。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000 Apr;84(4):451-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62280-6.
9
Comparative outdoor study of the efficacy, onset and duration of action, and safety of cetirizine, loratadine, and placebo for seasonal allergic rhinitis.西替利嗪、氯雷他定和安慰剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效、起效时间、作用持续时间及安全性的户外对照研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996 Feb;97(2):617-26. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)70307-x.
10
Comparative efficacy of cetirizine and fexofenadine for seasonal allergic rhinitis, 5-12 hours postdose, in the environmental exposure unit.西替利嗪和非索非那定治疗季节性变应性鼻炎在环境暴露舱内给药后5 - 12小时的疗效比较
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2005 Jul-Aug;26(4):275-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of an Allergen Exposure Chamber and Nasal Allergen Challenge Versus In-Field Symptom Assessment in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Triggered by Timothy Grass Pollen.对由梯牧草花粉引发的过敏性鼻炎患者,变应原暴露室和鼻内变应原激发试验与现场症状评估的比较评价
Allergy. 2025 May;80(5):1286-1297. doi: 10.1111/all.16518. Epub 2025 Mar 9.
2
A Modern Approach to Clinical Outcome Assessment in Allergy Management: Advantages of Allergen Exposure Chambers.过敏管理中临床结局评估的现代方法:过敏原暴露室的优势
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 29;13(23):7268. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237268.
3
Validated allergen exposure chamber is plausible tool for the assessment of house dust mite-triggered allergic rhinitis.
经验证的过敏原暴露室是评估屋尘螨引发的过敏性鼻炎的合理工具。
Allergy. 2023 Jan;78(1):168-177. doi: 10.1111/all.15485. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
4
Allergen Immunotherapy: Biomarkers and Clinical Outcome Measures.变应原免疫疗法:生物标志物与临床结局指标
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Feb 18;14:141-148. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S267522. eCollection 2021.
5
Towards definitive management of allergic rhinitis: best use of new and established therapies.迈向过敏性鼻炎的确定性管理:新型和现有疗法的最佳应用
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 May 27;16:39. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00436-y. eCollection 2020.
6
Assessment of Different Cetirizine Dosing Strategies on Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms: Findings of Two Randomized Trials.不同西替利嗪给药策略对季节性变应性鼻炎症状的评估:两项随机试验的结果
Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2018 Jul 13;9:2152656718783630. doi: 10.1177/2152656718783630. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
7
Onset of action for loratadine tablets for the symptomatic control of seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults challenged with ragweed pollen in the Environmental Exposure Unit: a post hoc analysis of total symptom score.在环境暴露单元中,对受豚草花粉激发的成年季节性过敏性鼻炎患者使用氯雷他定片进行症状控制的起效时间:总症状评分的事后分析
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan 16;14:5. doi: 10.1186/s13223-017-0227-4. eCollection 2018.
8
Controlled Allergen Challenge Facilities and Their Unique Contributions to Allergic Rhinitis Research.过敏原控制挑战设施及其对变应性鼻炎研究的独特贡献。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015 Apr;15(4):11. doi: 10.1007/s11882-015-0514-4.
9
A four-way, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study to determine the efficacy and speed of azelastine nasal spray, versus loratadine, and cetirizine in adult subjects with allergen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis.一项四向、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究,旨在确定氮卓斯汀鼻喷剂相对于氯雷他定和西替利嗪在成人变应原性季节性过敏性鼻炎患者中的疗效和起效速度。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 May 1;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-16. eCollection 2013.
10
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review.地氯雷他定、非索非那定和左西替利嗪的临床药代动力学与药效学:一项比较性综述
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(4):217-30. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200847040-00001.