Suppr超能文献

老年(≥60岁)供体肝脏的移植功能及预后

Graft function and outcome of older (> or = 60 years) donor livers.

作者信息

Washburn W K, Johnson L B, Lewis W D, Jenkins R L

机构信息

Division of Liver Transplantation and Heptobiliary Surgery, New England Deaconess Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachutts 02215, USA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 1996 Apr 15;61(7):1062-6. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199604150-00013.

Abstract

Livers from donors > or = 60 years of age are often considered inadequate for transplantation by many centers. With waiting times exceeding 1 year in our region, we have aggressively used livers from this donor age group. Between 1990 and 1994, 209 patients received 223 liver grafts at our institution. Of these, 29 (13%) were from donors > or = 60 years of age (group A) and 194 (87%) were from donors < 60 years of age (group B). The two groups were matched for recipient diagnosis and severity of disease. Group A and B donors had similar liver, renal, and hematologic studies prior to donation. Weight, sex, race and vasopressor requirement were also similar. Postoperative alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase,and prothrombin time were not significantly different over the first 10 postoperative days. Group A grafts were significantly more cholestatic than group B grafts on postoperative days 6-10. The retransplantation rate for primary graft nonfunction was not significantly different from group A (6.7%) and group B (3.4%; P=0.04). Patient and graft survival rates at 1 year were 58.6 % and 44.8% for group A and 79.2% and 74.5% for group B (P<0.001 for both). Four of 12 deaths in the first year in group A were completely unrelated to graft function. If these are excluded, patient and graft survival rates were 68% and 52%, which are better but still significantly less than in group B. Initial graft function of older donor livers are similar to that of the matched younger group. However, patient and graft survival rates were significantly worse for the older donors, even when corrected for unrelated deaths. Livers should not be discarded based on age alone without inspection and/or biopsy to rule out significant steatosis. Prompt retransplantation for primary graft nonfunction of older donors are generally more cholestatic than those from the younger donor age group; however, many of them function quite well. At the present time, given the inability to identify donor variables associated with decreased recipient survival, we recommend cautious use of older liver grafts in healthier recipients.

摘要

许多移植中心通常认为60岁及以上供体的肝脏不适于移植。由于我们所在地区等待时间超过1年,我们积极使用了这个供体年龄组的肝脏。1990年至1994年期间,209例患者在我们机构接受了223例肝移植。其中,29例(13%)来自60岁及以上供体(A组),194例(87%)来自60岁以下供体(B组)。两组在受者诊断和疾病严重程度方面进行了匹配。A组和B组供体在捐献前的肝脏、肾脏和血液学检查结果相似。体重、性别、种族和血管升压药需求也相似。术后第1个10天内,丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶和凝血酶原时间无显著差异。术后第6至10天,A组移植物的胆汁淤积明显多于B组。原发性移植物无功能的再次移植率在A组(6.7%)和B组(3.4%;P=0.04)之间无显著差异。A组1年时的患者和移植物存活率分别为58.6%和44.8%,B组为79.2%和74.5%(两者P<0.001)。A组第一年12例死亡中有4例与移植物功能完全无关。如果排除这些病例,患者和移植物存活率分别为68%和52%,虽有所改善但仍显著低于B组。老年供体肝脏的初始移植物功能与匹配的年轻组相似。然而,即使校正了无关死亡因素,老年供体的患者和移植物存活率仍显著较差。在未进行检查和/或活检以排除显著脂肪变性的情况下,不应仅根据年龄丢弃肝脏。老年供体原发性移植物无功能时及时再次移植通常比年轻供体年龄组的移植物胆汁淤积更严重;然而,其中许多移植物功能相当良好。目前,鉴于无法识别与受者存活率降低相关的供体变量,我们建议在健康状况较好的受者中谨慎使用老年肝脏移植物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验