Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 2121 W. Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
BMC Biol. 2023 Feb 13;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01533-1.
Aging is known to exert an effect on liver regeneration, with the ability of liver to regenerate displaying a significant decline over time. Liver physiological parameters such as liver volume, blood flow, and metabolism, as well as the ability to regenerate after injury have all been shown to decrease at old age in humans and model systems, with a number of molecular mechanisms proposed to be involved, including DNA methylation-dependent genome remodeling. To address how changes in DNA methylation mediate the adverse aging effect on liver regeneration, we searched for differentially methylated genomic regions (DMRs) in mouse livers co-regulated by aging and regeneration and determined their associated genes and enriched pathways.
DMRs were identified using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS). Pathway analysis of aging DMR-mapped genes revealed two distinct phases of aging, 2-to-8 and 8-to-16 months old (m/o). Regenerative DMR-mapped differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were enriched in pathways controlling cell proliferation and differentiation. Most DMRs shared by both aging and regeneration changed in the same methylation direction between 2 and 8 m/o but in the opposite direction between 8 and 16 m/o. Regenerative DMRs inversely affected by aging during 8-to-16 m/o were found in the promoter/gene regions of 12 genes. Four regenerative DEGs were synchronously regulated by early aging and inversely regulated by mid-to-late aging DMRs. Lead DMR-mapped genes were validated by their expression profiles in liver aging and regeneration.
Our study has uncovered new DMRs and gene targets inversely affected by liver aging and regeneration to explain the adverse aging effect on liver regeneration. These findings will be of fundamental importance to understand the epigenomic changes underlying the biology of aging on liver regeneration.
众所周知,衰老会对肝脏再生产生影响,随着时间的推移,肝脏的再生能力会显著下降。人类和模型系统的肝脏生理参数,如肝体积、血流量和代谢,以及受伤后的再生能力,在老年时都显示出下降,提出了许多涉及的分子机制,包括 DNA 甲基化依赖性基因组重塑。为了研究 DNA 甲基化变化如何介导衰老对肝脏再生的不利影响,我们在受衰老和再生共同调控的小鼠肝脏中寻找差异甲基化基因组区域(DMR),并确定其相关基因和富集途径。
使用全基因组亚硫酸氢盐测序(WGBS)鉴定 DMR。衰老 DMR 映射基因的途径分析揭示了衰老的两个不同阶段,2 至 8 个月龄和 8 至 16 个月龄(m/o)。再生 DMR 映射差异表达基因(DEG)在控制细胞增殖和分化的途径中富集。在 2 至 8 m/o 之间,大多数在衰老和再生中共享的 DMR 朝着相同的甲基化方向变化,但在 8 至 16 m/o 之间则相反。在 8 至 16 m/o 期间,衰老对再生的 DMR 具有相反影响的基因,在 12 个基因的启动子/基因区域被发现。4 个再生 DEG 被早期衰老的 DMR 同步调控,被中晚期衰老的 DMR 反向调控。通过肝衰老和再生的表达谱验证了先导 DMR 映射基因。
我们的研究揭示了新的 DMR 和基因靶点,这些靶点受肝脏衰老和再生的反向影响,以解释衰老对肝脏再生的不利影响。这些发现对于理解肝脏再生生物学中衰老的表观遗传变化至关重要。