Suppr超能文献

远程细胞学:宫颈-阴道涂片的诊断准确性

Telecytology: diagnostic accuracy in cervical-vaginal smears.

作者信息

Raab S S, Zaleski M S, Thomas P A, Niemann T H, Isacson C, Jensen C S

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242-1009, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1996 May;105(5):599-603. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/105.5.599.

Abstract

Although cervical-vaginal telecytology is a promising tool, diagnostic accuracy has not been extensively evaluated. The authors examined the accuracy of five cytotechnologists who retrospectively reviewed 50 cervical-vaginal smears using the video monitor, and 2 months later, using the light microscope. Accuracy was expressed in terms of crude agreement with the original diagnosis and number of false positives (FPs) and false negatives (FNs). With a greater than one step difference as discrepant, the group crude agreement using the video monitor and the light microscope was 85.6% and 95.6%, respectively. The group number of FNs and FPs for the light microscope was 8 and 7, respectively, and for the video monitor was 34 and 7, respectively. There was a wide range of individual performance. We conclude that accuracy of telecytology is high, but less than that of light microscopy. The major reason for lower telecytologic accuracy was undercalling dysplasia.

摘要

尽管宫颈-阴道远程细胞学检查是一种很有前景的工具,但尚未对其诊断准确性进行广泛评估。作者检查了五位细胞技术人员的准确性,他们回顾性地使用视频监视器检查了50份宫颈-阴道涂片,两个月后又使用光学显微镜进行检查。准确性通过与原始诊断的粗略一致性以及假阳性(FP)和假阴性(FN)的数量来表示。以大于一个级别的差异作为不一致,使用视频监视器和光学显微镜的组粗略一致性分别为85.6%和95.6%。光学显微镜的FN和FP数量分别为8和7,而视频监视器的分别为34和7。个体表现存在很大差异。我们得出结论,远程细胞学检查的准确性很高,但低于光学显微镜检查。远程细胞学检查准确性较低的主要原因是对发育异常的判断不足。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验