• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

振动/旋转式电动牙刷和声波牙刷对牙釉质表面污渍清除的效果。

The effect of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush on removal of stain from enamel surfaces.

作者信息

Schemehorn B R, Keil J C

机构信息

Indiana University School of Dentistry, Oral Health Research Institute, Indianapolis, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 1995;6(4):194-7.

PMID:8624231
Abstract

This laboratory investigation compared the Sonicare toothbrush, the Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover and a manual brush, in terms of removal of stained pellicle from the surface of enamel specimens. Enamel specimens were stained over a period of 4 days to produce a stained pellicle film. Staining was assessed photometrically before and after brushing 16 specimens per group for 4.5 minutes with the three test toothbrushes and dentifrice slurry prepared from Crest toothpaste. The positive control consisted of the ADA reference abrasive and a manual toothbrush. Results were expressed as a cleaning ratio (CR), with higher values representing more efficient stain removal. Analysis of results revealed that removal of stain from the enamel surfaces was similar in the Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover group (CR 94) and the reference standard group (CR 100). There was no statistically significant difference between these 2 groups. In contrast, stain removal in the Sonicare toothbrush group and the manual toothbrush group was significantly less effective (p<0.01), with a mean CR of 66 and 76, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the cleaning ratio scores for these 2 groups. It is concluded that extrinsic stain removal with the Sonicare toothbrush is similar to that achieved with a manual brush, but that stain removal with the Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover is significantly more effective.

摘要

本实验室研究比较了声波震动牙刷、博朗欧乐-B牙菌斑清除器和手动牙刷在去除牙釉质标本表面染色牙菌斑方面的效果。牙釉质标本经过4天的染色以形成染色牙菌斑膜。在使用三种测试牙刷和佳洁士牙膏制备的牙膏糊对每组16个标本进行4.5分钟刷牙前后,通过光度法评估染色情况。阳性对照由美国牙科协会(ADA)参考磨料和手动牙刷组成。结果以清洁率(CR)表示,数值越高表明污渍清除效率越高。结果分析显示,博朗欧乐-B牙菌斑清除器组(CR 94)和参考标准组(CR 100)从牙釉质表面清除污渍的效果相似。这两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。相比之下,声波震动牙刷组和手动牙刷组的污渍清除效果明显较差(p<0.01),平均清洁率分别为66和76。这两组的清洁率得分没有统计学差异。结论是,声波震动牙刷去除外源性污渍的效果与手动牙刷相似,但博朗欧乐-B牙菌斑清除器去除污渍的效果明显更好。

相似文献

1
The effect of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush on removal of stain from enamel surfaces.振动/旋转式电动牙刷和声波牙刷对牙釉质表面污渍清除的效果。
J Clin Dent. 1995;6(4):194-7.
2
A laboratory investigation of stain removal from enamel surface: comparative efficacy of three electric toothbrushes.从牙釉质表面去除污渍的实验室研究:三款电动牙刷的去污效果比较
Am J Dent. 1996 Jul;9 Spec No:S21-4.
3
A comparative study of stain removal with two electric toothbrushes and a manual brush.两种电动牙刷与一种手动牙刷去污效果的对比研究。
J Clin Dent. 1995;6(4):188-93.
4
Relative extrinsic stain removal effectiveness of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a flat trim manual toothbrush.一款新型电池驱动牙刷和一款扁平刷头手动牙刷去除外源性色斑的相对效果
Am J Dent. 2004 Jan;17 Spec No:13A-17A.
5
The relative cleaning effectiveness of manual and powered toothbrushes.手动牙刷和电动牙刷的相对清洁效果。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):211-4.
6
A comparative clinical study of extrinsic tooth stain removal with two electric toothbrushes [Braun D7 and D9] and a manual brush.使用两款电动牙刷(博朗D7和D9)及一款手动牙刷去除外源性牙齿色斑的对比临床研究。
Am J Dent. 1996 Jul;9 Spec No:S25-9.
7
A comparative clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush.一款振动/旋转电动牙刷与一款声波牙刷安全性和有效性的对比临床研究。
J Clin Dent. 1995;6(1):108-12.
8
Laboratory evaluation of extrinsic stain removal by a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies.采用具有独特传感与控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷对外源性色斑清除效果的实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A21-5.
9
A clinical evaluation of extrinsic stain removal: a rotation-oscillation power toothbrush versus a dental prophylaxis.外源性色斑清除的临床评估:旋转振荡动力牙刷与牙齿预防性洁治的对比
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Jul 1;9(5):1-8.
10
Clinical evaluation of the effects of a sonic toothbrush with ultrasound waveguide in disrupting plaque with and without bristle contact.带有超声波波导的声波牙刷在有刷毛接触和无刷毛接触情况下对牙菌斑清除效果的临床评估。
Am J Dent. 2008 Apr;21(2):83-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the efficacy of a charcoal-based tooth whitening dentifrice on coffee stains: an in vitro study.评价一种基于活性炭的牙齿增白牙膏对咖啡渍的疗效:一项体外研究。
Can J Dent Hyg. 2023 Jun 1;57(2):123-131. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Discoloration of PMMA, composite, and PEEK.聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯、复合材料和聚醚醚酮的变色
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1191-1200. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1892-2. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
3
Brushing without brushing?--a review of the efficacy of powered toothbrushes in noncontact biofilm removal.不刷牙就刷牙?--电动牙刷在非接触式生物膜去除中的功效综述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):687-709. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0836-8. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
4
Comparison of sonic and ionic toothbrush in reduction in plaque and gingivitis.声波牙刷与离子牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2011 Jul;15(3):210-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.85662.