• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与欧乐B 35型牙刷相比,Wisdom Straight、菌斑控制和斜角牙刷的临床比较评估

A comparative clinical evaluation of the Wisdom Straight, Plaque Control and Angled toothbrushes compared to the Oral-B 35.

作者信息

Yankell S L, Emling R C

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, University of Pennsylvania, School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 1995;6(4):202-6.

PMID:8624233
Abstract

Three Wisdom toothbrushes, the Straight, Plaque Control and Angled, were compared to the Oral-B 35 toothbrush for clinical safety and efficacy. The 30-day testing protocol conformed to the American Dental Association's program guidelines for manual toothbrushes. No irritation was observed nor reported at anytime for any of the toothbrushes evaluated. All toothbrushes tested were effective in reducing plaque area, gingivitis and bleeding on probing over the 30 days of the study.

摘要

将三款智慧牙刷,即直柄牙刷、防菌斑牙刷和弯角牙刷,与欧乐B 35牙刷进行了临床安全性和有效性比较。为期30天的测试方案符合美国牙科协会手动牙刷项目指南。在评估的任何一款牙刷上,在任何时候均未观察到或报告有刺激现象。在研究的30天里,所有测试的牙刷在减少菌斑面积、牙龈炎和探诊出血方面均有效。

相似文献

1
A comparative clinical evaluation of the Wisdom Straight, Plaque Control and Angled toothbrushes compared to the Oral-B 35.与欧乐B 35型牙刷相比,Wisdom Straight、菌斑控制和斜角牙刷的临床比较评估
J Clin Dent. 1995;6(4):202-6.
2
The clinical effect of a newly designed electric toothbrush on supragingival plaque, gingivitis and gingival bleeding.一种新设计的电动牙刷对龈上菌斑、牙龈炎和牙龈出血的临床效果。
J Clin Dent. 1996;7(1):17-20.
3
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
4
A single-use and 3-month clinical investigation of the comparative efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush.一项关于电动牙刷和手动牙刷比较功效的一次性使用且为期3个月的临床研究。
Am J Dent. 2001 Nov;14 Spec No:19B-24B.
5
The comparative plaque removal efficacy of two advanced manual toothbrush designs in two independent clinical studies.两项独立临床研究中两种先进手动牙刷设计的相对牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Dent. 2001;12(3):83-6.
6
A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.三维动作电动牙刷与高频电动牙刷减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎的分口对照研究。
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2001 Oct;3(4):95-103.
7
A 3-month comparative investigation of the safety and efficacy of a new toothbrush: results from two independent clinical studies.
Am J Dent. 2000 Mar;13(Spec No):27A-32A.
8
Two long-term clinical studies comparing the plaque removal and gingivitis reduction efficacy of the Oral-B Advantage Plaque Remover to five manual toothbrushes.两项长期临床研究比较了欧乐-B专业型牙菌斑清除器与五款手动牙刷在去除牙菌斑和减轻牙龈炎方面的功效。
J Clin Dent. 1994;5(2):46-53.
9
A Thirty-Day Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Rowenta, Braun and Sonicare Powered Toothbrushes and a Manual Toothbrush.Rowenta、博朗和飞利浦声波震动牙刷与手动牙刷的30天安全性和有效性评估。
J Clin Dent. 1997;8(4):120-3.
10
The clinical effects on plaque and gingivitis over three-month's use of four complex-design manual toothbrushes.
J Clin Dent. 1994;5(4):114-8.