Kulovaný E, Weiss P, Zvĕrina J
Sexuologický ústav 1. LF UK, Praha.
Ceska Gynekol. 1996 Feb;61(1):27-31.
Using an anonymous questionnaire, the authors assessed the sexual and contraceptive behaviour of 130 applicants for induced abortions and 330 applicants for hormonal contraception. Between the two groups these main differences were found: applicants for abortion used less frequently effective contraception and used more frequently unreliable contraceptive methods. This difference was obvious during the first intercourse as well as during later life. The use of contraception in this group is more limited also as compared with the nationwide average. In the case-history of applicants for abortion previous abortions were more frequent, as well as prostitute behaviour and the prevalence of venereal diseases. As regards heterosexual behaviour the applicants for abortion and applicants for hormonal contraception did not differ substantially. According to the authors the differences between the examined groups depend more on personality traits than sexuological characteristics.
作者通过一份匿名问卷，对130名人工流产申请者和330名激素避孕申请者的性行为及避孕行为进行了评估。在这两组之间发现了以下主要差异：人工流产申请者较少使用有效的避孕方法，而更频繁地使用不可靠的避孕方法。这种差异在首次性行为以及之后的生活中都很明显。与全国平均水平相比，该组的避孕措施使用也更为有限。在人工流产申请者的病史中，既往流产更为频繁，还有卖淫行为和性传播疾病的患病率。在异性性行为方面，人工流产申请者和激素避孕申请者没有实质性差异。作者认为，被调查群体之间的差异更多地取决于个性特征而非性学特征。
