Bonner J A, Eagan R T, Liengswangwong V, Frytak S, Shaw E G, Evans R G, Creagan E T, Richardson R L
Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Cancer. 1995 Aug 1;76(3):406-12. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950801)76:3<406::aid-cncr2820760310>3.0.co;2-s.
A Phase I/II study of an aggressive six-drug chemotherapy regimen followed by the use of sequential hemibody radiation therapy as a possible non-cross-resistant systemic treatment was undertaken for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
The 20 enrolled patients received 7 cycles of cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. The first cycle consisted of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine, and lomustine. Subsequent cycles used a regimen of doxorubicin alternating with cisplatin. Thoracic radiation was delivered in a split-course fashion during the first week of chemotherapy cycles 5 and 6 (2000 cGy in five fractions during each week). Prophylactic cranial radiation was delivered in a split-course fashion during the first week of chemotherapy cycles 2 and 3 (1700 cGy in 5 fractions during each week). After the 7 cycles, patients received 600 cGy upper hemibody radiation followed by 800 cGy lower hemibody radiation.
Nineteen of 20 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response to treatment. Hematologic toxicity accounted for treatment delays or decreased doses in 16 of 19 patients. Thirteen patients completed the initial 7 cycles; progressive disease was the only reason for discontinuing treatment. Two patients had fatal hematologic complications after lower hemibody radiation. Three patients had severe or greater peripheral neurologic toxicity, two had severe central neurologic toxicity, and one had severe cardiac toxicity. Of 19 patients, 9 achieved a complete response; median survival was 11.5 months. Five-year progression free survival and 5-year overall survival were 27% and 16%, respectively.
This aggressive regimen is feasible for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer; however, hematologic-related mortality after lower hemibody radiation suggests that future investigations should be initiated at lower initial doses of lower hemibody radiation. Long term survival of the patients suggests that sequential hemibody radiation treatment warrants further investigation.
