Averette H E, Janicek M F, Menck H R
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Miami Medical School, Florida, USA.
Cancer. 1995 Sep 15;76(6):1096-103. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950915)76:6<1096::aid-cncr2820760626>3.0.co;2-4.
Reports generated from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a joint project of the American College of Surgeons Commission of Cancer and the American Cancer Society, have described trends in demographics, stage, treatment patterns, and survival for a variety of cancers. In this report, the most current (1991) data for ovarian cancer are presented and include some comparisons with 1985/1986 data.
Three calls for data from hospital registries across the United States have yielded 17,114 ovarian cancer cases for 1985, 1986, and 1991 combined. These data represent approximately 23%, 23%, and 43%, respectively, of the annual number of cases of ovarian cancer in the United States for those years.
One-fourth of the reported cases of ovarian cancer were diagnosed in women less than 50 years of age. Younger patients (< 40 years) were more likely to have received conservative therapy (unilateral oophorectomy), consistent with their high prevalence (59%) of Stage I disease. The number of patients reported with an unknown American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage decreased from 49% in 1985/1986 to 17% in 1991, although the distribution within stages was unchanged. Increases in important staging procedures were reported in 1991, with threefold increase in the proportion of debulking procedures and a 50% increase in omentectomies accompanying hysterectomy compared with 1985/1986. More advanced disease was reported for those of older age, lower income, African Americans, and patients in smaller hospitals. Relative 5-year survival rates were 74% for patients with Stage I disease, 58% for Stage II, 30% for Stage III, and 19% for Stage IV. Asians and Hispanics presented with a relatively high rate of Stage I-II disease (45%) compared with non-Hispanic whites and African Americans (38% and 33%, respectively). Hispanics presented with the most favorable Stage I/IV ratio (1.5) and had an overall 5-year survival of 50% compared with 41% and 37% for non-Hispanic whites and African Americans (Stage I/IV ratios of 1.0 and 0.7, respectively). There was little difference reported in the use of multimodality treatment between 1985/1986 and 1991.
A trend toward more complete surgery with full surgical/pathologic staging was observed in 1991, but there was not yet evidence to indicate significant improvements in ovarian cancer survival compared with published figures during the past 10-15 years. Important ethnic and demographic differences in type of surgery and survival were noted but could not be differentiated from differences in tumor stage.
美国外科医师学会癌症委员会与美国癌症协会联合开展的国家癌症数据库(NCDB)生成的报告描述了多种癌症在人口统计学、分期、治疗模式及生存率方面的趋势。本报告展示了卵巢癌的最新(1991年)数据,并与1985/1986年的数据进行了一些比较。
向美国各地医院登记处进行了三次数据征集,共获得1985年、1986年和1991年合并的17114例卵巢癌病例。这些数据分别约占当年美国卵巢癌病例数的23%、23%和43%。
报告的卵巢癌病例中有四分之一是在50岁以下的女性中诊断出来的。年轻患者(<40岁)更有可能接受保守治疗(单侧卵巢切除术),这与她们较高的Ⅰ期疾病患病率(59%)一致。报告的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期不明的患者数量从1985/1986年的49%降至1991年的17%,尽管各期内的分布没有变化。1991年报告了重要分期手术的增加,与1985/1986年相比,肿瘤细胞减灭术的比例增加了两倍,子宫切除术中同时进行大网膜切除术的比例增加了50%。年龄较大、收入较低、非裔美国人以及较小医院的患者报告的疾病分期更晚。Ⅰ期疾病患者的相对5年生存率为74%,Ⅱ期为58%,Ⅲ期为30%,Ⅳ期为19%。与非西班牙裔白人和非裔美国人(分别为38%和33%)相比,亚洲人和西班牙裔呈现出相对较高的Ⅰ-Ⅱ期疾病发生率(45%)。西班牙裔呈现出最有利的Ⅰ/Ⅳ期比例(1.5),总体5年生存率为50%,而非西班牙裔白人和非裔美国人的这一比例分别为41%和37%(Ⅰ/Ⅳ期比例分别为1.0和0.7)。1985/1986年和1991年在多模式治疗的使用上报告的差异不大。
1991年观察到一种采用完整手术及全面手术/病理分期的更彻底手术趋势,但尚无证据表明与过去10 - 15年公布的数据相比,卵巢癌生存率有显著提高。注意到了手术类型和生存率方面重要的种族和人口统计学差异,但无法与肿瘤分期差异区分开来。