Leatherman J W, Ravenscraft S A
Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA.
Crit Care Med. 1996 Mar;24(3):541-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199603000-00028.
To describe the occurrence of low measured auto-end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) during mechanical ventilation of patients severe asthma.
Observational clinical study.
Medical intensive care unit of a university-affiliated county hospital.
Four mechanically ventilated patients with severe asthma who had low measured auto-PEEP despite marked increase in both peak and plateau airway pressures.
None.
Peak pressure, plateau pressure, and auto-PEEP were measured at an early time point, when airflow obstruction was most severe, and again at a later time after clinical improvement. Auto-PEEP was measured by the method of end-expiratory airway occlusion. From the early to the late point, there was a marked decrease in peak pressure (76 +/- 7 to 53 +/- 6 cm H2O; p<.001) and in plateau pressure (28 +/- 2 to 18 +/- 3 cm H2O; p<.001), but only minimal change in auto-PEEP (5 +/- 3 to 4 +/- 3 cm H2O). The difference between plateau pressure and auto-PEEP decreased between the early and late time points (23 +/- 1 to 14 +/- 1 cm H2O; p<.01), even though tidal volume was larger at the late time point. In three patients, low auto-PEEP and a large difference between plateau pressure and auto-PEEP was only seen after expiratory time was prolonged. In these three patients, prolongation of expiratory time resulted in a large decrease in measured auto-PEEP (14 +/- 4 to 5 +/- 4 cm H2O), but a much smaller change in plateau pressure (31 +/- 3 to 29 +/- 3 cm H2O).
We conclude that measured auto-PEEP may underestimate end-expiratory alveolar pressure in severe asthma, and that marked pulmonary hyperinflation may be present despite low measured auto-PEEP, especially at low respiratory rates. This phenomenon may be due to widespread airway closure that prevents accurate assessment of alveolar pressure at end-expiration.
描述重症哮喘患者机械通气期间测得的呼气末内源性呼气末正压(auto-PEEP)降低的情况。
观察性临床研究。
一所大学附属医院的医疗重症监护病房。
4例机械通气的重症哮喘患者,尽管气道峰压和平台压均显著升高,但测得的auto-PEEP仍较低。
无。
在气流阻塞最严重的早期时间点测量气道峰压、平台压和auto-PEEP,临床改善后的较晚时间点再次测量。通过呼气末气道阻断法测量auto-PEEP。从早期到晚期,气道峰压显著降低(76±7至53±6 cmH₂O;p<0.001),平台压也显著降低(28±2至18±3 cmH₂O;p<0.001),但auto-PEEP仅有微小变化(5±3至4±3 cmH₂O)。早期和晚期时间点之间,平台压与auto-PEEP的差值减小(23±1至14±1 cmH₂O;p<0.01),尽管晚期时间点的潮气量更大。3例患者中,仅在呼气时间延长后才出现低auto-PEEP以及平台压与auto-PEEP的较大差值。在这3例患者中,呼气时间延长导致测得的auto-PEEP大幅降低(14±4至5±4 cmH₂O),但平台压变化小得多(31±3至29±3 cmH₂O)。
我们得出结论,在重症哮喘中,测得的auto-PEEP可能低估呼气末肺泡压力,尽管测得的auto-PEEP较低,但可能存在明显的肺过度充气,尤其是在低呼吸频率时。这种现象可能是由于广泛的气道闭合,导致呼气末肺泡压力无法准确评估。