Suppr超能文献

一项关于劳拉西泮作为支气管镜检查术前用药的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lorazepam as premedication for bronchoscopy.

作者信息

Maltais F, Laberge F, Laviolette M

机构信息

Unité de recherche Centre de pneumologie de l'Hôpital Laval, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Chest. 1996 May;109(5):1195-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.5.1195.

Abstract

To our knowledge, no study has clearly demonstrated the advantage of sedative premedication for bronchoscopy. In a double-blind study, we evaluated the efficacy of oral lorazepam as premedication for bronchoscopy. One hundred patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (group A) or lorazepam (2 mg) (group B) approximately 1.5 h before bronchoscopy. Immediately after the procedure and the following day, a questionnaire addressing the patient's perception of the procedure was administered. Specifically, subjects were asked to grade the bronchoscopy as very easy, easy, difficult, or very difficult to tolerate and if they would agree to a second bronchoscopy if believed necessary. In addition, their recollection of the procedure was graded as clear, indistinct, or not at all. No difference was found between the two groups for age, duration of the bronchoscopy, and the answers to the questionnaire administered immediately after the procedure. Most patients from both groups found their level of sedation adequate. On the following day, however, group B reported with lower frequency that the technique was difficult or very difficult (38.0% vs 65.3% for group A; p < 0.005) and that they would be less reluctant to a repeated bronchoscopy (30.0% vs 57.1% for group A; p < 0.015). Moreover, their recollection of the procedure was now less precise than for those who had received the placebo (p < 0.005). This suggests that the difference observed between the two groups at 24 h was related to the amnesic effect of lorazepam. We conclude that lorazepam, by improving patient's perception of the bronchoscopy, is a useful premedication and may facilitate patient's investigation when a second bronchoscopy becomes necessary.

摘要

据我们所知,尚无研究明确证明支气管镜检查前使用镇静药物的优势。在一项双盲研究中,我们评估了口服劳拉西泮作为支气管镜检查前用药的疗效。100例患者在支气管镜检查前约1.5小时被随机分配接受安慰剂(A组)或劳拉西泮(2mg)(B组)。检查结束后立即以及第二天,发放一份关于患者对检查感受的问卷。具体而言,受试者被要求将支气管镜检查评为非常容易、容易、困难或非常难以耐受,以及如果认为有必要,他们是否会同意再次进行支气管镜检查。此外,他们对检查过程的记忆被评为清晰、模糊或完全没有印象。两组在年龄、支气管镜检查持续时间以及检查结束后立即发放的问卷答案方面没有差异。两组的大多数患者都认为他们的镇静程度足够。然而,在第二天,B组报告称该技术困难或非常困难的频率较低(A组为65.3%,B组为38.0%;p<0.005),并且他们对再次进行支气管镜检查的抵触情绪较小(A组为57.1%,B组为30.0%;p<0.015)。此外,他们对检查过程的记忆现在比接受安慰剂的患者更不精确(p<0.005)。这表明两组在24小时时观察到的差异与劳拉西泮的遗忘作用有关。我们得出结论,劳拉西泮通过改善患者对支气管镜检查的感受,是一种有用的术前用药,并且在需要再次进行支气管镜检查时可能有助于患者的检查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验