Carter E R, Webb C R, Moffitt D R
Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Wash 98410-5000, USA.
Chest. 1996 May;109(5):1256-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.5.1256.
To determine whether breathing a blend of 70% helium:30% oxygen (heliox) would improve pulmonary function, decrease clinical score, and improve the sensation of dyspnea in children hospitalized with acute severe asthma.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study.
The inpatient pediatric service of a military, tertiary care, teaching hospital.
Children 5 to 18 years who required hospital admission for treatment of acute asthma.
All patients received 5 mg of nebulized albuterol every 1 to 4 h, with a dose given within 30 min of the start of the study, and IV administered methylprednisolone. Patients breathed heliox and a 30% oxygen-enriched air mixture for 15 min each in random order.
Clinical score, dyspnea score, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate, followed by FVC, FEV1, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and, mean midexpiratory flow rate (FEF25-75) were obtained at study entry, 15 min after breathing the first gas mixture (heliox or air per randomization), 15 min after breathing the second mixture, and again 15 min after stopping the second gas mixture (study end values). Eleven children were enrolled, and all completed the study. There were no significant differences between study entry and study end spirometric values. Using the paired t test, we found no significant differences between mean values (SD) of FEV1 and FVC obtained while breathing heliox vs air; FEV1-heliox, 53% (18%) of the predicted value; FEV1-air, 52% (16%) of the predicted value (p = 0.36); FVC-heliox, 69% (22%) of the predicted value; and FVC-air, 70% (21%) of the predicted value (p = 0.50). The differences in values for PEFSR and FEF25-75 while breathing heliox vs air were small but did reach statistical significance in favor of heliox: PEFR-heliox, 56% (20%) of the predicted value; PEFR-air, 50% (16%) of the predicted value (p = 0.04); FEF25-75-heliox, 32% (13%) of the predicted value; and FEF25-75-heliox, 29% (11%) of the predicted value (p = 0.006). Heliox had no effect on either clinical or dyspnea scores.
The short-term inhalation of heliox did not benefit this group of children hospitalized with acute, severe asthma.
确定吸入70%氦气与30%氧气的混合气体(氦氧混合气)是否能改善急性重症哮喘住院儿童的肺功能、降低临床评分并减轻呼吸困难的感觉。
前瞻性、随机、双盲、交叉研究。
一家军队三级护理教学医院的儿科住院部。
因急性哮喘需住院治疗的5至18岁儿童。
所有患者每1至4小时接受5毫克雾化沙丁胺醇治疗,在研究开始后30分钟内给药一次,并静脉注射甲泼尼龙。患者随机依次吸入氦氧混合气和30%富氧空气混合物各15分钟。
在研究开始时、吸入第一种气体混合物(根据随机分组为氦氧混合气或空气)15分钟后、吸入第二种混合物15分钟后以及停止吸入第二种气体混合物15分钟后(研究结束时的值),分别记录临床评分、呼吸困难评分、血氧饱和度、心率和呼吸频率,随后测量用力肺活量(FVC)、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、呼气峰值流速(PEFR)和平均呼气中期流速(FEF25-75)。招募了11名儿童,所有儿童均完成了研究。研究开始时和研究结束时的肺量计测量值之间无显著差异。使用配对t检验,我们发现吸入氦氧混合气与空气时,FEV1和FVC的平均值(标准差)之间无显著差异;吸入氦氧混合气时FEV1为预测值的53%(18%);吸入空气时FEV1为预测值的52%(16%)(p = 0.36);吸入氦氧混合气时FVC为预测值的69%(22%);吸入空气时FVC为预测值的70%(21%)(p = 0.50)。吸入氦氧混合气与空气时,PEFR和FEF25-75值的差异较小,但确实在统计学上有利于氦氧混合气:吸入氦氧混合气时PEFR为预测值的56%(20%);吸入空气时PEFR为预测值的50%(16%)(p = 0.04);吸入氦氧混合气时FEF25-75为预测值的32%(13%);吸入空气时FEF25-75为预测值的29%(11%)(p = 0.006)。氦氧混合气对临床评分和呼吸困难评分均无影响。
短期吸入氦氧混合气对这组急性重症哮喘住院儿童无益处。