Suppr超能文献

用于非插管急性哮喘患者的氦氧混合气

Helium-oxygen mixture for nonintubated acute asthma patients.

作者信息

Rodrigo G, Rodrigo C, Pollack C, Travers A

机构信息

Departamento de Emergencia, Hospital Central de las FF.AA., Av. 8 de Octubre 3020', Montevideo, Uruguay, 11600.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD002884. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002884.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Helium and oxygen mixtures (heliox), have been used sporadically in respiratory medicine for decades. Their use in acute respiratory emergencies such as asthma has been the subject of considerable debate. Despite the lapse of more than 60 years since it was first proposed, the role of heliox in treating patients with acute severe asthma is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of the addition of heliox to standard medical care on the course of acute asthma, as measured by pulmonary function testing and clinical endpoints.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomized controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group Asthma Register which is a compilation of systematic searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL and hand searching of the 20 most productive respiratory care journals. In addition, primary authors and experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. References from included studies, known reviews and texts were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria were: 1) randomized, single or double blind, controlled trials; 2) children or adults with a clinical diagnosis of acute asthma seen in emergency departments or equivalent acute care settings; 3) compared treatment with inhaled heliox compared with a control (oxygen or air). Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for inclusion and quality assessment; disagreement was resolved by a third reviewer and consensus.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data from all included trials were combined using weighted mean differences (WMD), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in a random effects model. Homogeneity of effect sizes were tested with the Dersimonian and Laird method with p<0.1 as the cut point for significance. Sensitivity analyses were performed on age (adults vs. children), different helium-oxygen mixtures and methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials were selected for inclusion with a total of 288 acute asthma patients. Three studies involved adults and one study dealt solely with children. Two were of low quality. The main outcome variable was spirometric measurements (PFT % predicted) in all trials. Pooling the four trials showed no significant differences (WMD = -1.61; 95% CI: -6.64 to 3.41). All pulmonary function tests were recorded during heliox administration (15 to 60 min). There was no evidence of heterogeneity between studies. There were no significant differences between groups when adults vs. children, high vs. low quality, and high vs. low heliox dose studies were compared. The findings were the with a fixed effects model.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence does not provide support for the administration of helium-oxygen mixtures to patients presenting to the emergency department with moderate to severe acute asthma. Heliox treatment does not have a role in the initial treatment of patients with acute asthma. These conclusions are based upon between-group comparisons and small studies. Additional research in this setting may be warranted.

摘要

背景

氦氧混合气(氦氧混合气体)已在呼吸医学领域断断续续使用了数十年。其在哮喘等急性呼吸紧急情况中的应用一直是相当多争论的主题。自首次提出以来,尽管已经过去了60多年,但氦氧混合气在治疗急性重度哮喘患者中的作用仍不明确。

目的

通过肺功能测试和临床终点指标,确定在标准医疗护理基础上加用氦氧混合气对急性哮喘病程的影响。

检索策略

从Cochrane Airways Group哮喘注册库中识别随机对照试验,该注册库是对CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE和CENTRAL进行系统检索以及对20种最高产的呼吸护理期刊进行手工检索的汇编。此外,还联系了主要作者和专家以识别符合条件的研究。对纳入研究的参考文献、已知综述和文献也进行了检索。

入选标准

入选标准为:1)随机、单盲或双盲对照试验;2)在急诊科或同等急性护理环境中临床诊断为急性哮喘的儿童或成人;3)将吸入氦氧混合气治疗与对照(氧气或空气)进行比较。两名评审员独立评估研究是否纳入以及进行质量评估;分歧由第三名评审员解决并达成共识。

数据收集与分析

使用加权均数差(WMD)合并所有纳入试验的数据,并采用随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(95%CI)。采用Dersimonian和Laird方法检验效应量的同质性,以p<0.1作为显著性的截断点。对年龄(成人与儿童)、不同氦氧混合气以及方法学质量进行敏感性分析。

主要结果

共选择4项随机对照试验纳入,共有288例急性哮喘患者。3项研究涉及成人,1项研究仅涉及儿童。2项研究质量较低。所有试验的主要结局变量均为肺量计测量值(预测PFT%)。汇总这4项试验显示无显著差异(WMD = -1.61;95%CI:-6.64至3.41)。所有肺功能测试均在给予氦氧混合气期间(15至60分钟)记录。研究之间没有异质性的证据。在比较成人与儿童、高质量与低质量以及高剂量与低剂量氦氧混合气研究时,组间没有显著差异。固定效应模型的结果也是如此。

评审员结论

现有证据不支持对中度至重度急性哮喘的急诊科患者给予氦氧混合气。氦氧混合气治疗在急性哮喘患者的初始治疗中没有作用。这些结论基于组间比较和小型研究。在这种情况下可能需要进行更多研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验