Sison J P, Yao Y, Kemper C A, Hamilton J R, Brummer E, Stevens D A, Deresinski S C
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128, USA.
J Infect Dis. 1996 Mar;173(3):677-83. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.3.677.
The ability of various in vitro methods of antibiotic susceptibility testing to predict therapeutic outcome in patients infected with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) was evaluated. Pretreatment bloodstream MAC isolates from 38 patients with AIDS, previously treated in a randomized fashion with either ethambutol, rifampin, or clofazimine, were tested by three conventional methods using broth or agar, as well as by cocultivation with macrophages. The results obtained with each method were compared with the quantitatively determined bacteriologic response to the administration of the single agent in humans. None of the conventional in vitro susceptibility methods was predictive of therapeutic outcome, while the results of cocultivation with macrophages were of moderate predictive value. The positive predictive value of a response in humans based on a response in macrophages (defined by > or = to 1.0 log reduction in baseline colony counts after 5 days of treatment) was 74%. The negative predictive value was 82%.
评估了各种体外抗生素敏感性测试方法预测鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)感染患者治疗结果的能力。从38例艾滋病患者中获取治疗前血液中的MAC分离株,这些患者先前已随机接受乙胺丁醇、利福平或氯法齐明治疗,采用三种常规方法(使用肉汤或琼脂)以及与巨噬细胞共培养进行测试。将每种方法获得的结果与人体中单一药物给药后定量测定的细菌学反应进行比较。没有一种传统的体外敏感性方法能够预测治疗结果,而与巨噬细胞共培养的结果具有中等预测价值。基于巨噬细胞反应(定义为治疗5天后基线菌落计数减少≥1.0对数)预测人体反应的阳性预测值为74%。阴性预测值为82%。