Suppr超能文献

比较ZEBRA和ZEBRA/c-Fos嵌合体的转录激活和自刺激作用。

Comparing transcriptional activation and autostimulation by ZEBRA and ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeras.

作者信息

Kolman J L, Taylor N, Gradoville L, Countryman J, Miller G

机构信息

Department of Molecular Biophysics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.

出版信息

J Virol. 1996 Mar;70(3):1493-504. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.3.1493-1504.1996.

Abstract

The lytic cycle of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can be activated by transfection of the gene for ZEBRA, a viral basic-zipper (bZip) transcriptional activator. ZEBRA and cellular AP-1 bZip activators, such as c-Fos, have homologous DNA-binding domains, and their DNA-binding specificities overlap. Moreover, EBV latency can also be disrupted by phorbol esters, which act, in part, through AP-1 activators. It is not known whether ZEBRA and AP-1 factors play equivalent roles in the initial stages of reactivation. Here the contribution of ZEBRA's basic DNA recognition domain to disruption of latency was analyzed by comparing ZEBRA with chimeric mutants in which the DNA recognition domain of ZEBRA was replaced with the analogous domain of c-Fos. Chimeric ZEBRA/c-Fos proteins overexpressed in Escherichia coli bound DNA with the specificity of c-Fos; they bound a heptamer AP-1 site and an octamer TPA response element (TRE). ZEBRA bound the AP-1 site and an array of ZEBRA response elements (ZREs). In assays with reporter genes, both ZEBRA and ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeric mutants activated transcription from Zp, a promoter of the ZEBRA gene (BZLF1) that contains the TRE and multiple ZREs. However, despite their capacity to activate reporters bearing Zp, neither ZEBRA nor the c-Fos chimeras activated transcription from Zp in the context of the intact latent viral genome. In contrast, ZEBRA but not ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeras activated Rp, a second viral promoter that controls ZEBRA expression. Hence, transcriptional autostimulation by transfected ZEBRA occurred preferentially at Rp. Both ZEBRA and the ZEBRA/c-Fos chimeras activated transcription from reporters with multimerized AP-1 sites. However, in the context of the virus, only ZEBRA activated the promoters of two early lytic cycle genes, BMRF1 and BMLF1, that contain an AP-1 site. Thus, overexpression of an activator that recognized AP-1 and TRE sites was not sufficient to activate EBV early lytic cycle genes.

摘要

爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)的裂解周期可通过转染ZEBRA基因来激活,ZEBRA是一种病毒碱性拉链(bZip)转录激活因子。ZEBRA与细胞AP-1 bZip激活因子,如c-Fos,具有同源的DNA结合结构域,且它们的DNA结合特异性存在重叠。此外,佛波酯也可破坏EBV潜伏期,佛波酯部分通过AP-1激活因子发挥作用。目前尚不清楚ZEBRA和AP-1因子在重新激活的初始阶段是否发挥等同作用。在此,通过将ZEBRA与嵌合突变体进行比较,分析了ZEBRA的碱性DNA识别结构域对潜伏期破坏的作用,在嵌合突变体中,ZEBRA的DNA识别结构域被c-Fos的类似结构域所取代。在大肠杆菌中过表达的嵌合ZEBRA/c-Fos蛋白以c-Fos的特异性结合DNA;它们结合七聚体AP-1位点和八聚体佛波酯反应元件(TRE)。ZEBRA结合AP-1位点和一系列ZEBRA反应元件(ZRE)。在报告基因检测中,ZEBRA和ZEBRA/c-Fos嵌合突变体均激活了Zp的转录,Zp是ZEBRA基因(BZLF1)的启动子,包含TRE和多个ZRE。然而,尽管它们有能力激活携带Zp的报告基因,但在完整的潜伏病毒基因组背景下,ZEBRA和c-Fos嵌合体均未激活Zp的转录。相反,ZEBRA而非ZEBRA/c-Fos嵌合体激活了Rp,Rp是控制ZEBRA表达的第二个病毒启动子。因此,转染的ZEBRA的转录自刺激优先发生在Rp。ZEBRA和ZEBRA/c-Fos嵌合体均激活了具有多聚化AP-1位点的报告基因的转录。然而,在病毒背景下,只有ZEBRA激活了两个早期裂解周期基因BMRF1和BMLF1的启动子,这两个基因含有一个AP-1位点。因此,识别AP-1和TRE位点的激活因子的过表达不足以激活EBV早期裂解周期基因。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验