Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术后颈外动脉的自然病程:对治疗的启示

The natural history of the external carotid artery after carotid endarterectomy: implications for management.

作者信息

Ascer E, Gennaro M, Pollina R M, Salles-Cunha S, Lorenson E, Yorkovich W R, Ivanov M

机构信息

Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1996 Apr;23(4):582-5; discussion 585-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)80036-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Most surgeons perform some type of endarterectomy of the external carotid artery (ECA) routinely during standard carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This approach has been shown to result in a small percentage of ECA occlusions, the clinical significance of which remains poorly understood. We have modified our approach to the management of the ECA during standard CEA by averting any attempt at external CEA. To evaluate the natural history of the untreated ECA after CEA, we reviewed the preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up duplex scans obtained from 232 CEAs over the past 4 years.

METHODS

Preoperative and postoperative carotid artery duplex examinations with specific evaluation of the extent of ECA stenosis were available for review on 114 CEAs performed between January 1991 and July 1994. All CEAs were performed for internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 75% as determined by duplex scanning, which was confirmed by either contrast arteriography or magnetic resonance angiography.

RESULTS

Seventy-three (64.0%) procedures were performed for symptomatic lesions, whereas 41 (36.0%) were performed for asymptomatic stenosis. There were no perioperative strokes or transient ischemic attacks in this group, and there was one postoperative death (0.9%). Short- and intermediate-term follow-up demonstrated insignificant changes in ECA diameter after operation, with no cases of ECA occlusion and only five cases progressing to greater than 75% on the 1-year follow up duplex examination.

CONCLUSION

We conclude from these data that averting external CEA during standard CEA does not result in significant progression of ECA stenosis or occlusion.

摘要

目的

大多数外科医生在标准颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)过程中常规进行某种类型的颈外动脉(ECA)内膜切除术。这种方法已被证明会导致一小部分ECA闭塞,但其临床意义仍知之甚少。我们通过避免对ECA进行任何手术尝试,改进了标准CEA中ECA的处理方法。为了评估CEA后未处理的ECA的自然病程,我们回顾了过去4年中232例CEA的术前、术后和随访双功超声扫描结果。

方法

对1991年1月至1994年7月期间进行的114例CEA,可获得术前和术后颈动脉双功超声检查结果,并对ECA狭窄程度进行了具体评估。所有CEA均针对双功超声扫描确定的颈内动脉狭窄大于75%进行,经造影动脉造影或磁共振血管造影证实。

结果

73例(64.0%)手术针对有症状病变进行,而41例(36.0%)针对无症状狭窄进行。该组无围手术期卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作,术后死亡1例(0.9%)。短期和中期随访显示术后ECA直径无明显变化,无ECA闭塞病例,1年随访双功超声检查仅有5例进展至大于75%。

结论

我们从这些数据得出结论,在标准CEA过程中避免进行ECA内膜切除术不会导致ECA狭窄或闭塞的显著进展。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验