Suppr超能文献

颈动脉介入治疗后颈外动脉的转归

Fate of the external carotid artery following carotid interventions.

作者信息

Casey Kevin, Zhou Wei, Tedesco Maureen M, Al-Khatib Weesam K, Hernandez-Boussard Tina, Bech Fritz

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery;

出版信息

Int J Angiol. 2009 Winter;18(4):173-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278348.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The external carotid artery (ECA) is an important collateral pathway for cerebral blood flow. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) typically crosses the ECA, while carotid endarterectomy (CEA) includes deliberate ECA plaque removal. The purpose of the present study was to compare the long-term patency of the ECA following CAS and CEA as determined by carotid duplex ultrasound.

METHODS

Duplex ultrasounds and hospital records were reviewed for consecutive patients undergoing CAS between February 2002 and April 2008, and were compared with those undergoing CEA in the same time period. Preoperative and postoperative ECA peak systolic velocities were normalized to the common carotid artery (CCA) as ECA/CCA ratios. A significant (80% or greater) ECA stenosis was defined as an ECA/CCA ratio of 4.0. A change of ratio by more than 1 was defined as significant. Data were analyzed using Student's t test and χ(2) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 86 CAS procedures in 83 patients were performed (81 men, mean age 69.9 years). Among them, 38.4% of patients had previous CEA, 9.6% of whom had contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion. Sixty-seven CAS and 65 CEA patients with complete duplex data in the same time period were included in the analyses. There was no difference in the incidence of severe ECA stenosis on preoperative ultrasound evaluations. During a mean follow-up of 34 months (range four to 78 months), three postprocedure ECA occlusions were found in the CAS group. The likelihood of severe stenosis or occlusion following CAS was 28.3%, compared with 11% following CEA (P<0.025). However, 62% of CEA patients and 57% of CAS patients had no significant change in ECA status. Reduction in the patient's degree of ECA stenosis was observed in 9.4% of CAS versus 26.6% of CEA patients. Overall, immediate postoperative ratios of both groups were slightly improved, but there was a trend of more disease progression in the CAS group during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

CAS is associated with a higher incidence of post-procedure ECA stenosis. Despite the absence of neurological symptoms, a trend toward late disease progression of ECA following CAS warrants long-term evaluation.

摘要

目的

颈外动脉(ECA)是脑血流的一条重要侧支通路。颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)通常会穿过ECA,而颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)则包括有意去除ECA斑块。本研究的目的是通过颈动脉双功超声比较CAS和CEA术后ECA的长期通畅情况。

方法

回顾了2002年2月至2008年4月期间连续接受CAS治疗患者的双功超声检查结果和医院记录,并与同期接受CEA治疗的患者进行比较。术前和术后ECA的收缩期峰值流速以ECA/颈总动脉(CCA)比值进行标准化。显著(80%或更高)的ECA狭窄定义为ECA/CCA比值为4.0。比值变化超过1定义为显著变化。数据采用Student t检验和χ²分析。

结果

共对83例患者进行了86次CAS手术(81例男性,平均年龄69.9岁)。其中,38.4%的患者曾接受过CEA治疗,其中9.6%的患者对侧颈内动脉闭塞。分析纳入了同期67例CAS患者和65例CEA患者的完整双功超声数据。术前超声评估中重度ECA狭窄的发生率无差异。在平均34个月的随访期(4至78个月)内,CAS组发现3例术后ECA闭塞。CAS术后发生重度狭窄或闭塞的可能性为28.3%,而CEA术后为11%(P<0.025)。然而,62%的CEA患者和57%的CAS患者ECA状态无显著变化。9.4%的CAS患者与26.6%的CEA患者观察到ECA狭窄程度降低。总体而言,两组术后即刻比值均略有改善,但随访期间CAS组疾病进展趋势更明显。

结论

CAS术后ECA狭窄的发生率较高。尽管没有神经症状,但CAS术后ECA疾病晚期进展的趋势值得长期评估。

相似文献

1
Fate of the external carotid artery following carotid interventions.
Int J Angiol. 2009 Winter;18(4):173-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278348.
3
Flow velocities in the external carotid artery following carotid revascularization.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Oct;46(4):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
4
Carotid artery stenting has increased risk of external carotid artery occlusion compared with carotid endarterectomy.
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
5
The fate of the external carotid artery after carotid artery stenting. A follow-up study with duplex ultrasonography.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jun;33(6):657-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
8
The natural history of the external carotid artery after carotid endarterectomy: implications for management.
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Apr;23(4):582-5; discussion 585-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)80036-x.
10
The outcome of external carotid endarterectomy during routine carotid endarterectomy.
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Oct;28(4):585-90. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70080-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemodynamic Impact of Stenting on Carotid Bifurcation: A Potential Role of the Stented Segment and External Carotid Artery.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Nov 26;2021:7604532. doi: 10.1155/2021/7604532. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
The fate of the external carotid artery after carotid artery stenting. A follow-up study with duplex ultrasonography.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jun;33(6):657-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
3
Carotid artery velocity characteristics after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting.
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;45(3):523-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.11.044. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
4
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040.
5
Carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection: assessing the learning curve and treatment outcome.
Am J Surg. 2005 Dec;190(6):850-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.008.
6
Effect of carotid artery stenting on the external carotid artery.
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Nov;38(5):1039-44. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00550-0.
8
The contribution of the external carotid artery to cerebral perfusion in carotid disease.
J Vasc Surg. 2000 May;31(5):989-93. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.104598.
9
The outcome of external carotid endarterectomy during routine carotid endarterectomy.
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Oct;28(4):585-90. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70080-1.
10
The natural history of the external carotid artery after carotid endarterectomy: implications for management.
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Apr;23(4):582-5; discussion 585-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)80036-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验