Fenton J E, Turner J, Fagan P A
Department of Otology/Neuro-Otology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Laryngoscope. 1996 May;106(5 Pt 1):624-8. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199605000-00020.
It is widely accepted that external auditory canal exostoses and osteomata are separate clinical entities that differ in their gross appearance. Disagreement still exists as to whether external auditory canal exostoses and osteomata should be considered similar or separate histopathologic entities. A chart review was performed of all patients who had external auditory canal exostoses or temporal bone osteomata excised from January 1991 to November 1994 at St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney. A histologic examination was undertaken with a blind study method of the patients whose pathological specimens were suitable for assessment. Eight exostoses and five osteomata were available for examination. The results of this study demonstrate that exostoses and osteomata of the external auditory canal cannot be reliably differentiated by routine histopathological examination.
外耳道外生骨疣和骨瘤是不同的临床实体,其外观明显不同,这一点已被广泛接受。然而,对于外耳道外生骨疣和骨瘤应被视为相似还是不同的组织病理学实体,仍存在分歧。对1991年1月至1994年11月在悉尼圣文森特医院切除外耳道外生骨疣或颞骨骨瘤的所有患者进行了图表回顾。对病理标本适合评估的患者采用盲法进行组织学检查。有8个外生骨疣和5个骨瘤可供检查。本研究结果表明,外耳道外生骨疣和骨瘤不能通过常规组织病理学检查可靠地区分。