Suppr超能文献

使用同轴放置的20号自动切割针进行经胸针吸活检:122例患者的结果

Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxially placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients.

作者信息

Klein J S, Salomon G, Stewart E A

机构信息

Department of Radiology, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 1996 Mar;198(3):715-20. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.3.8628859.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the utility of coaxial transthoracic needle biopsy (TNB) with use of a 20-gauge automated cutting biopsy needle in the diagnosis of thoracic lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed in 122 patients. Computed tomography was used to guide coaxial TNB, which was performed with aspirating (n = 87) and automated cutting (n = 99) needles. The sensitivities for malignant and benign lesions were determined, with a comparison of the relative yields from the two techniques.

RESULTS

The overall diagnostic yield for coaxial TNB was 88%. For malignancy the sensitivity was 95%, whereas a specific benign diagnosis was obtained in 91%. Although no difference was found for fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy of malignant lesions (92% vs 86%), a statistically significant difference was found for benign lesions (44% vs 100%, P<.05). Pneumothorax occurred in 54%.

CONCLUSION

Coaxial TNB performed with an automated cutting needle helps provide a diagnosis in the majority of patients with focal chest disease and is particularly useful in the diagnosis of benign lesions.

摘要

目的

确定使用20号自动切割活检针进行同轴经胸针吸活检(TNB)在胸部病变诊断中的效用。

材料与方法

对122例患者进行回顾性研究。采用计算机断层扫描引导同轴TNB,使用抽吸针(n = 87)和自动切割针(n = 99)进行操作。确定恶性和良性病变的敏感性,并比较两种技术的相对取材成功率。

结果

同轴TNB的总体诊断成功率为88%。对于恶性病变,敏感性为95%,而良性病变的特异性诊断率为91%。虽然恶性病变的细针抽吸与粗针活检之间未发现差异(92%对86%),但良性病变存在统计学显著差异(44%对100%,P<0.05)。气胸发生率为54%。

结论

使用自动切割针进行同轴TNB有助于为大多数局灶性胸部疾病患者提供诊断,尤其在良性病变的诊断中有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验