• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 15 mg with piroxicam 20 mg in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

作者信息

Lindén B, Distel M, Bluhmki E

机构信息

Eksjö Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:35-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.35.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.35
PMID:8630634
Abstract

Meloxicam 15 mg once daily (n = 128) was compared with piroxicam 20 mg (n = 127) in this 6 week, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized, multicentre study in out-patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. Assessments of pain, global efficacy and global tolerance were made on a 10 cm horizontal visual analogue scale; severity of OA was evaluated by Lequesne's index. Efficacy results showed significant improvement compared with baseline, with no significant difference between meloxicam 15 mg and piroxicam 20 mg. The type and frequency of adverse events were comparable for the two drugs. The most frequent events reported were gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, occurring in 21 and 23% of meloxicam and piroxicam patients respectively. The global tolerance assessment by patients at the end of treatment favoured meloxicam. In conclusion, meloxicam at a dose of 15 mg/day is comparable in efficacy and safety to piroxicam 20 mg.

摘要

相似文献

1
A double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 15 mg with piroxicam 20 mg in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:35-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.35.
2
A comparison of the local tolerability, safety and efficacy of meloxicam and piroxicam suppositories in patients with osteoarthritis: a single-blind, randomized, multicentre study.美洛昔康与吡罗昔康栓剂治疗骨关节炎患者的局部耐受性、安全性及有效性比较:一项单盲、随机、多中心研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 1995;13(6):343-55. doi: 10.1185/03007999509110494.
3
Tolerability of multiple administration of intramuscular meloxicam: a comparison with intramuscular piroxicam in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis.肌肉注射美洛昔康多次给药的耐受性:与类风湿性关节炎或骨关节炎患者肌肉注射吡罗昔康的比较。
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:51-5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.51.
4
Improvement in gastrointestinal tolerability of the selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, meloxicam, compared with piroxicam: results of the Safety and Efficacy Large-scale Evaluation of COX-inhibiting Therapies (SELECT) trial in osteoarthritis.与吡罗昔康相比,选择性环氧化酶(COX)-2抑制剂美洛昔康的胃肠道耐受性改善:骨关节炎中COX抑制疗法的安全性和有效性大规模评估(SELECT)试验结果
Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Sep;37(9):946-51. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.9.946.
5
A 4-week, double-blind, parallel-group study to compare the gastrointestinal effects of meloxicam 7.5 mg, meloxicam 15 mg, piroxicam 20 mg and placebo by means of faecal blood loss, endoscopy and symptom evaluation in healthy volunteers.一项为期4周的双盲平行组研究,通过检测健康志愿者的粪便失血情况、进行内窥镜检查及症状评估,比较7.5毫克美洛昔康、15毫克美洛昔康、20毫克吡罗昔康及安慰剂对胃肠道的影响。
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:61-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.61.
6
Efficacy and safety of low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam in the treatment of osteoarthritis pain: a 12-week, phase 3 study.低剂量速溶型美洛昔康治疗骨关节炎疼痛的疗效与安全性:一项为期12周的3期研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Dec;31(12):2331-43. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1112772.
7
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and tolerance of meloxicam treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.一项关于美洛昔康治疗膝骨关节炎有效性和耐受性的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Scand J Rheumatol. 1998;27(1):32-7. doi: 10.1080/030097498441146.
8
Meloxicam in osteoarthritis: a 6-month, double-blind comparison with diclofenac sodium.美洛昔康治疗骨关节炎:与双氯芬酸钠进行的为期6个月的双盲对照研究。
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:39-43. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.39.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of intramuscular and oral meloxicam in patients with acute lumbago: a comparison with intramuscular and oral piroxicam.急性腰痛患者肌内注射与口服美洛昔康的疗效及耐受性:与肌内注射和口服吡罗昔康的比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 1997;14(1):29-38. doi: 10.1185/03007999709113340.
10
Review of clinical trials and benefit/risk ratio of meloxicam.美洛昔康的临床试验及获益/风险比综述。
Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1996;102:29-37. doi: 10.3109/03009749609097228.

引用本文的文献

1
Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Relatively Selective COX-2 Inhibitors Versus Coxibs for the Prevention of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury.比较相对选择性COX-2抑制剂与昔布类药物预防非甾体抗炎药引起的胃肠道损伤的网状Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(40):e1592. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001592.
2
Gastrointestinal tolerability of meloxicam and piroxicam: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.美洛昔康和吡罗昔康的胃肠道耐受性:一项双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;46(2):133-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00761.x.
3
Cyclo-oxygenase isoenzymes. How recent findings affect thinking about nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
环氧化酶同工酶。近期研究结果如何影响对非甾体抗炎药的认识
Drugs. 1997 Apr;53(4):563-82. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753040-00003.
4
Meloxicam.美洛昔康
Drugs. 1996 Mar;51(3):424-30; discussion 431-32. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651030-00007.