• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性腰痛患者肌内注射与口服美洛昔康的疗效及耐受性:与肌内注射和口服吡罗昔康的比较

Efficacy and tolerability of intramuscular and oral meloxicam in patients with acute lumbago: a comparison with intramuscular and oral piroxicam.

作者信息

Bosch H C, Sigmund R, Hettich M

机构信息

Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1997;14(1):29-38. doi: 10.1185/03007999709113340.

DOI:10.1185/03007999709113340
PMID:9524791
Abstract

In this controlled, randomised, parallel-group, multicentre study, the efficacy and tolerability of an intramuscular (i.m.) dose of meloxicam (15 mg) on Day 1 followed by seven days of oral meloxicam (15 mg/day) were compared with those of an i.m. dose of piroxicam (20 mg) on Day 1 followed by seven days of oral piroxicam (20 mg/day) therapy in a total of 169 outpatients with acute lumbago. Time to onset of analgesic action after i.m. injection was determined, and overall efficacy, pain on movement, limitation of daily activities, local tolerability at the injection site and overall tolerability were assessed by investigators and patients on verbal rating scales (VRSs). Adverse events and laboratory assessments were documented. Meloxicam and piroxicam showed a rapid onset of action after i.m. injection (40 and 45 minutes median time, respectively), overall efficacy of both therapies was highly rated, and limitations to daily life were greatly reduced in the majority of patients in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in efficacy between meloxicam and piroxicam. Local and overall tolerabilities were equally good for the two drugs, but there were fewer gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events among meloxicam patients (1.2% of patients) than piroxicam patients (7.0% of patients). The improved tolerability profile of meloxicam may be explained by its selectivity towards cyclooxygenase-2.

摘要

在这项对照、随机、平行组、多中心研究中,将169例急性腰痛门诊患者中第1天肌内注射美洛昔康(15毫克)随后7天口服美洛昔康(15毫克/天)的疗效和耐受性,与第1天肌内注射吡罗昔康(20毫克)随后7天口服吡罗昔康(20毫克/天)治疗的疗效和耐受性进行了比较。测定了肌内注射后镇痛作用开始的时间,研究者和患者通过语言评定量表(VRS)评估了总体疗效、运动时疼痛、日常活动受限情况、注射部位局部耐受性和总体耐受性。记录了不良事件和实验室评估结果。美洛昔康和吡罗昔康肌内注射后起效迅速(中位时间分别为40分钟和45分钟),两种治疗的总体疗效均得到高度评价,两组大多数患者的日常生活受限情况均有大幅减轻。美洛昔康和吡罗昔康在疗效上无统计学显著差异。两种药物的局部和总体耐受性同样良好,但美洛昔康组患者的胃肠道(GI)不良事件(占患者的1.2%)比吡罗昔康组患者(占患者的7.0%)少。美洛昔康耐受性改善的情况可能是由于其对环氧化酶-2的选择性所致。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of intramuscular and oral meloxicam in patients with acute lumbago: a comparison with intramuscular and oral piroxicam.急性腰痛患者肌内注射与口服美洛昔康的疗效及耐受性:与肌内注射和口服吡罗昔康的比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 1997;14(1):29-38. doi: 10.1185/03007999709113340.
2
The efficacy and tolerability of an 8-day administration of intravenous and oral meloxicam: a comparison with intramuscular and oral diclofenac in patients with acute lumbago. German Meloxicam Ampoule Study Group.静脉注射和口服美洛昔康8天给药的疗效和耐受性:与急性腰痛患者肌肉注射和口服双氯芬酸的比较。德国美洛昔康安瓿研究组
Curr Med Res Opin. 1996;13(7):363-77. doi: 10.1185/03007999609111556.
3
Tolerability of multiple administration of intramuscular meloxicam: a comparison with intramuscular piroxicam in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis.肌肉注射美洛昔康多次给药的耐受性:与类风湿性关节炎或骨关节炎患者肌肉注射吡罗昔康的比较。
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:51-5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.51.
4
Meloxicam: a review of its pharmacokinetics, efficacy and tolerability following intramuscular administration.美洛昔康:肌肉注射后的药代动力学、疗效及耐受性综述
Inflamm Res. 2001 Mar;50 Suppl 1:S5-9. doi: 10.1007/PL00022377.
5
A comparison of the local tolerability, safety and efficacy of meloxicam and piroxicam suppositories in patients with osteoarthritis: a single-blind, randomized, multicentre study.美洛昔康与吡罗昔康栓剂治疗骨关节炎患者的局部耐受性、安全性及有效性比较:一项单盲、随机、多中心研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 1995;13(6):343-55. doi: 10.1185/03007999509110494.
6
A double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 15 mg with piroxicam 20 mg in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:35-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.35.
7
Comparison of intramuscular and oral meloxicam in rheumatoid arthritis patients.类风湿关节炎患者中肌肉注射与口服美洛昔康的比较。
Inflamm Res. 2001 Mar;50 Suppl 1:S10-6. doi: 10.1007/PL00022374.
8
A 4-week, double-blind, parallel-group study to compare the gastrointestinal effects of meloxicam 7.5 mg, meloxicam 15 mg, piroxicam 20 mg and placebo by means of faecal blood loss, endoscopy and symptom evaluation in healthy volunteers.一项为期4周的双盲平行组研究,通过检测健康志愿者的粪便失血情况、进行内窥镜检查及症状评估,比较7.5毫克美洛昔康、15毫克美洛昔康、20毫克吡罗昔康及安慰剂对胃肠道的影响。
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:61-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.61.
9
Improvement in gastrointestinal tolerability of the selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, meloxicam, compared with piroxicam: results of the Safety and Efficacy Large-scale Evaluation of COX-inhibiting Therapies (SELECT) trial in osteoarthritis.与吡罗昔康相比,选择性环氧化酶(COX)-2抑制剂美洛昔康的胃肠道耐受性改善:骨关节炎中COX抑制疗法的安全性和有效性大规模评估(SELECT)试验结果
Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Sep;37(9):946-51. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.9.946.
10
Comparison of the onset and intensity of action of intramuscular meloxicam and oral meloxicam in patients with acute sciatica.急性坐骨神经痛患者中肌肉注射美洛昔康与口服美洛昔康起效时间及作用强度的比较。
Clin Ther. 1995 Nov-Dec;17(6):1078-98. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80086-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Myofascial pain syndrome: a treatment review.肌筋膜疼痛综合征:治疗综述。
Pain Ther. 2013 Jun;2(1):21-36. doi: 10.1007/s40122-013-0006-y. Epub 2013 Feb 12.