• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,以评估特拉唑嗪治疗良性前列腺增生的安全性和有效性。

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of terazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

作者信息

Elhilali M M, Ramsey E W, Barkin J, Casey R W, Boake R C, Beland G, Fradet Y, Trachtenberg J, Orovan W L, Schick E, Klotz L H

机构信息

McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.

出版信息

Urology. 1996 Mar;47(3):335-42. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80449-X.

DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80449-X
PMID:8633398
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocker terazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

Two hundred twenty-four patients aged 50 to 80 years, who had a diagnosis of BPH based on medical history, physical examination, and digital palpation, were recruited from 11 different sites between January 1992 and January 1994. The study consisted of a screening phase, a placebo phase, a double-blind dose-titration phase, and a double-blind maintenance phase.

RESULTS

Of the patients recruited, 164 entered the double-blind phase and of these 134 were evaluable. Only 11 patients withdrew because of an adverse event, 7 in the terazosin and 4 in the placebo group. Compared to placebo, terazosin significantly increased peak and mean urine flow rates without significantly affecting voided volume or postvoid residual volume. It significantly improved both the obstructive and irritative symptoms associated with BPH. Fifty-one patients from the terazosin group reported a total of 120 adverse events compared with 83 reported by 42 patients in the placebo group. The majority of these events were mild to moderate. Seventeen terazosin-treated patients reported hypotension-related adverse events and 4 withdrew from the study. However, concurrent treatment with antihypertensive agents did not affect the blood pressure response of the terazosin group.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study showed terazosin to be safe and effective in relieving the signs and symptoms of BPH and should be considered as a treatment alternative.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估选择性α1肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂特拉唑嗪治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的安全性和有效性。

方法

1992年1月至1994年1月期间,从11个不同地点招募了224名年龄在50至80岁之间、根据病史、体格检查和直肠指诊诊断为BPH的患者。该研究包括筛选阶段、安慰剂阶段、双盲剂量滴定阶段和双盲维持阶段。

结果

在招募的患者中,164人进入双盲阶段,其中134人可进行评估。只有11名患者因不良事件退出,特拉唑嗪组7人,安慰剂组4人。与安慰剂相比,特拉唑嗪显著提高了峰值和平均尿流率,而对排尿量或残余尿量没有显著影响。它显著改善了与BPH相关的梗阻性和刺激性症状。特拉唑嗪组的51名患者共报告了120起不良事件,而安慰剂组的42名患者报告了83起。这些事件大多为轻度至中度。17名接受特拉唑嗪治疗的患者报告了与低血压相关的不良事件,4人退出研究。然而,同时使用抗高血压药物并未影响特拉唑嗪组的血压反应。

结论

总体而言,本研究表明特拉唑嗪在缓解BPH的体征和症状方面是安全有效的,应被视为一种治疗选择。

相似文献

1
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of terazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,以评估特拉唑嗪治疗良性前列腺增生的安全性和有效性。
Urology. 1996 Mar;47(3):335-42. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80449-X.
2
Effects of terazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. A pilot study.特拉唑嗪治疗良性前列腺增生的效果。一项初步研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1989 Oct;39(10):1289-91.
3
The safety and efficacy of terazosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.特拉唑嗪治疗良性前列腺增生的安全性和有效性。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1989 Aug;27(8):392-7.
4
Clinical comparison of selective and non-selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonists for bladder outlet obstruction associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: studies on tamsulosin and terazosin in Chinese patients. The Chinese Tamsulosin Study Group.选择性与非选择性α1A肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂治疗良性前列腺增生所致膀胱出口梗阻的临床比较:坦索罗辛与特拉唑嗪在中国患者中的研究。中国坦索罗辛研究组
J Med. 1998;29(5-6):289-304.
5
The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Study Group.特拉唑嗪、非那雄胺或两者联合治疗良性前列腺增生症的疗效。退伍军人事务部协作研究良性前列腺增生症研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Aug 22;335(8):533-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199608223350801.
6
[Efficiency and tolerance of terazosine in ambulatory patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy: comparative randomized and double-blind trial versus alfuzosin. The MG Terazosine Group].特拉唑嗪治疗门诊良性前列腺增生患者的疗效及耐受性:与阿夫唑嗪对比的随机双盲试验。MG特拉唑嗪组
Prog Urol. 2000 Apr;10(2):246-53.
7
Efficacy and safety of combined therapy with terazosin and tolteradine for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective study.特拉唑嗪与托特罗定联合治疗良性前列腺增生相关下尿路症状患者的疗效与安全性:一项前瞻性研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Mar 5;120(5):370-4.
8
Effects of branded versus generic terazosin hydrochloride in adults with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, open-label, crossover study in Taiwan.品牌与非专利盐酸特拉唑嗪对台湾成年良性前列腺增生患者的影响:一项随机、开放标签、交叉研究
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):670-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.013.
9
Clinical experience: symptomatic management of BPH with terazosin.临床经验:用特拉唑嗪对良性前列腺增生进行症状管理。
Urology. 1988 Dec;32(6 Suppl):27-31.
10
The Hytrin Community Assessment Trial study: a one-year study of terazosin versus placebo in the treatment of men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. HYCAT Investigator Group.海特林社区评估试验研究:一项为期一年的特拉唑嗪与安慰剂治疗有症状良性前列腺增生男性的对比研究。海特林社区评估试验研究调查组
Urology. 1996 Feb;47(2):159-68. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80409-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Add-on treatment with mirabegron may improve quality of life in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complaining of persistent storage symptoms after tamsulosin monotherapy.在坦索罗辛单药治疗后仍有持续性储尿期症状的良性前列腺增生患者中,加用米拉贝隆进行治疗可能会改善其生活质量。
Ther Adv Urol. 2020 Dec 18;12:1756287220974130. doi: 10.1177/1756287220974130. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Comparative effectiveness of oral drug therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.用于治疗良性前列腺增生所致下尿路症状的口服药物疗法的比较有效性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 12;9(9):e107593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107593. eCollection 2014.
3
Current role of treatment in men with lower urinary tract symptoms combined with overactive bladder.目前治疗下尿路症状合并膀胱过度活动症男性患者的作用。
Prostate Int. 2014;2(2):43-9. doi: 10.12954/PI.14045. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
4
A meta-analysis of the vascular-related safety profile and efficacy of alpha-adrenergic blockers for symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia.α-肾上腺素能阻滞剂治疗良性前列腺增生相关症状的血管相关安全性和疗效的荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;62(10):1547-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01880.x.
5
Outcomes and quality of life issues in the pharmacological management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).良性前列腺增生症(BPH)药物治疗的结局和生活质量问题。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Mar;3(1):181-96. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.1.181.
6
Use of meta-analytic results to facilitate shared decision making.利用荟萃分析结果促进共同决策。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Sep-Oct;6(5):412-9. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060412.
7
Conservative non-instrumental treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生的保守非器械治疗
Urol Res. 1997;25 Suppl 2:S107-14. doi: 10.1007/BF00941996.
8
Efficacy and safety of finasteride therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a 2-year randomized controlled trial (the PROSPECT study). PROscar Safety Plus Efficacy Canadian Two year Study.非那雄胺治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效与安全性:一项为期2年的随机对照试验结果(PROSPECT研究)。保法止安全性与疗效加拿大两年研究。
CMAJ. 1996 Nov 1;155(9):1251-9.