Hatala R, Dinh T, Cook D J
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Apr 15;124(8):717-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-8-199604150-00003.
To compare the efficacy, nephrotoxicity, and ototoxicity of once-daily aminoglycoside dosing with those of standard aminoglycoside regimens in immuno-competent adults.
A structured MEDLINE search from 1966 to April 1995 using the keywords aminoglycosides, drug administration schedule, and adult; bibliographic searching of review articles, position papers, and references of the selected articles; contact with primary authors of selected articles to obtain information not in the published reports and lists of potentially relevant articles.
Randomized, controlled trials that 1) compared an intravenous once-daily aminoglycoside regimen with a standard aminoglycoside regimen in infected immunocompetent adults and 2) examined efficacy, mortality, or toxicity.
For each selected study, two independent reviewers assessed methodologic quality and abstracted data. The heterogeneity of individual study risk ratios was assessed and data were pooled using a random-effects model.
Forty-two studies were reviewed for possible inclusion. Thirteen independent studies met the selection criteria, and their results were pooled. The trials had a mean methodologic quality score of 0.69 (range, 0.50 to 0.91). Heterogeneity exists among the individual risk ratios for clinical cure (P = 0.07); significant heterogeneity does not exist for the other outcomes. For the pooled efficacy outcomes, the risk ratio for bacteriologic cure is 1.02 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.05), and the risk ratio for mortality is 0.91 (CI, 0.63 to 1.31). For the pooled toxicity outcomes, the risk ratio for nephrotoxicity is 0.87 (CI, 0.60 to 1.26), and the risk ratio for ototoxicity is 0.67 (CI, 0.35 to 1.28).
Standard and once-daily aminoglycoside dosing regimens are equivalent with regard to bacteriologic cure, and once-daily dosing shows a trend toward reduced mortality and toxicity. However, additional studies are needed for more precise estimates of mortality and toxicity risk ratios. The equivalency of the dosing regimens, the ease of administration, reduced nursing time, and reduced variability in the timing of drug administration that are associated with once-daily dosing may mean that the once-daily regimen is clinically advantageous.
比较免疫功能正常的成年人中,每日一次氨基糖苷类药物给药方案与标准氨基糖苷类药物治疗方案的疗效、肾毒性和耳毒性。
1966年至1995年4月,使用关键词“氨基糖苷类”、“给药方案”和“成年人”对MEDLINE进行结构化检索;对综述文章、立场文件及所选文章的参考文献进行文献检索;与所选文章的第一作者联系,以获取发表报告中未提及的信息及潜在相关文章列表。
随机对照试验,条件为:1)在感染的免疫功能正常的成年人中,比较静脉注射每日一次氨基糖苷类药物治疗方案与标准氨基糖苷类药物治疗方案;2)考察疗效、死亡率或毒性。
对于每项所选研究,两名独立评审员评估方法学质量并提取数据。评估各个研究风险比的异质性,并使用随机效应模型汇总数据。
对42项研究进行了是否可能纳入的审查。13项独立研究符合选择标准,并汇总了其结果。这些试验的平均方法学质量评分为0.69(范围为0.50至0.91)。临床治愈的各个风险比之间存在异质性(P = 0.07);其他结局不存在显著异质性。对于汇总的疗效结局,细菌学治愈的风险比为1.02(95%可信区间,0.99至1.05),死亡率的风险比为0.91(可信区间,0.�3至1.31)。对于汇总的毒性结局,肾毒性的风险比为0.87(可信区间,0.60至1.26),耳毒性的风险比为0.67(可信区间,0.35至1.28)。
标准给药方案和每日一次氨基糖苷类药物给药方案在细菌学治愈方面相当,每日一次给药显示出死亡率和毒性降低的趋势。然而,需要更多研究来更精确地估计死亡率和毒性风险比。给药方案的等效性、给药便利性、护理时间减少以及与每日一次给药相关的给药时间变异性降低,可能意味着每日一次给药方案在临床上具有优势。