Tate W H, Goldschmidt M C, Ward M T, Grant R L
University of Texas-Houston Dental Branch, Department of General Dentistry, Section of Operative Dentistry, 77030-3402, USA.
Am J Dent. 1995 Oct;8(5):270-2.
To evaluate the efficacy of several methods of sterilization and disinfection on two different types of composite finishing and polishing instruments.
The instruments consisted of a proprietary light-cured resin cup impregnated with an abrasive and a silicon dioxide-impregnated rubber cup. Chemical and physical methods included treatment with iodophor, synthetic phenol, glutaraldehyde, microwaving, autoclaving, and chemiclaving.
Glutaraldehyde (Vital Defense-S) was an effective disinfectant; however, other chemical (cold) disinfectants overall, were not reliable. Autoclaving, chemiclaving, and microwaving all provided to be effective means of sterilization.
评估几种灭菌和消毒方法对两种不同类型的复合树脂修整和抛光器械的效果。
器械包括一个浸渍有磨料的专利光固化树脂杯和一个浸渍有二氧化硅的橡胶杯。化学和物理方法包括用碘伏、合成酚、戊二醛处理、微波处理、高压蒸汽灭菌和化学蒸汽灭菌。
戊二醛（Vital Defense-S）是一种有效的消毒剂；然而，总体而言，其他化学（冷）消毒剂不可靠。高压蒸汽灭菌、化学蒸汽灭菌和微波处理均被证明是有效的灭菌手段。
