Whose data are they anyway?
作者信息
Delamothe T
出版信息
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1241-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1241.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Whose data are they anyway?这些数据到底是谁的？
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1241-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1241.
2
Sharing statistical data in the biomedical and health sciences: ethical, institutional, legal, and professional dimensions.生物医学与健康科学领域的统计数据共享：伦理、机构、法律及专业层面
Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:1-18. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.000245.
3
Protocol review within the context of a research program.研究项目背景下的方案审查。
IRB. 1998 Jul-Aug;20(4):7-10.
4
The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.文献中欺诈行为的持续存在：达西事件。
J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1992 Aug;43(7):488-93. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199208)43:7<488::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-7.
5
Publishing the results of sponsored clinical research.发表赞助临床研究的结果。
BMJ. 1993 Nov 20;307(6915):1296-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6915.1296.
6
Whose article is it anyway?这到底是谁的文章？
Lancet. 1999 Jul 10;354(9173):136. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)75272-7.
7
Outrage over live HIV treatment.对艾滋病病毒现场治疗的愤怒。
New Sci. 1991 Apr 13;130(1764):10.
8
Ethical aspects of human experimentation in health services research.卫生服务研究中人体实验的伦理问题。
JAMA. 1991 Apr 10;265(14):1854-7.
9
10
Sharing scientific data I: new problems for IRBs.共享科学数据I：机构审查委员会面临的新问题。
IRB. 1989 Nov-Dec;11(6):4-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Patient consent to publication and data sharing in industry and NIH-funded clinical trials.患者对行业资助及美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）资助的临床试验中发表研究成果和数据共享的同意。
Trials. 2018 May 3;19(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2651-2.
2
Sharing raw data from clinical trials: what progress since we first asked "Whose data set is it anyway?".分享临床试验的原始数据：自我们首次提出“这到底是谁的数据集？”以来有何进展。
Trials. 2016 May 4;17(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1369-2.
3
Is the relationship among outcome variables shown in randomized trials?随机试验中显示的是结果变量之间的关系吗？
Trials. 2015 Feb 22;16:57. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0584-6.
4
Presentation of continuous outcomes in randomised trials: an observational study.随机试验中连续结果的呈现：一项观察性研究。
BMJ. 2012 Dec 18;345:e8486. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8486.
5
Estimating the re-identification risk of clinical data sets.估算临床数据集的再识别风险。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 9;12:66. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-66.
6
Lack of proportionality. Seven specifications of public interest that override post-approval commercial interests on limited access to clinical data.缺乏相称性。有七个公共利益的规范，凌驾于有限获取临床数据的上市后商业利益之上。
Trials. 2012 Jul 2;13:100. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-100.
7
De-identifying a public use microdata file from the Canadian national discharge abstract database.从加拿大国家出院摘要数据库中去除公开使用的微观数据文件的标识符。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Aug 23;11:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-53.
8
The re-identification risk of Canadians from longitudinal demographics.从纵向人口统计学角度来看加拿大国民的再识别风险。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Jun 22;11:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-46.
9
Protecting privacy using k-anonymity.使用 k-匿名保护隐私。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):627-37. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2716. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
10
Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers.医学论文中检验统计量与P值之间的不一致性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 May 28;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-13.
本文引用的文献
1
Intersalt: hypertension rise with age revisited.国际食盐与血压研究（Intersalt）：重新审视高血压随年龄增长的情况。
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1283-4; discussion 1284-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1283.
2
Intersalt revisited: further analyses of 24 hour sodium excretion and blood pressure within and across populations. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group.再探INTERSALT研究：对不同人群及其内部24小时钠排泄量与血压的进一步分析。INTERSALT合作研究小组
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1249-53. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1249.
3
Should there be a trial of home versus hospital delivery in the United Kingdom?英国是否应该进行家庭分娩与医院分娩的对比试验？
BMJ. 1996 Mar 23;312(7033):753-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7033.753.
4
The scandal of poor medical research.糟糕的医学研究丑闻。
BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):283-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283.
5
Increasing the accessibility of data.提高数据的可获取性。
BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1519-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1519.
Zotero 插件