Suppr超能文献

奈多罗米钠与安慰剂临床疗效的对比研究。色甘酸钠作为阳性对照治疗效果如何?

A comparative study of the clinical efficacy of nedocromil sodium and placebo. How does cromolyn sodium compare as an active control treatment?

作者信息

Schwartz H J, Blumenthal M, Brady R, Braun S, Lockey R, Myers D, Mansfield L, Mullarkey M, Owens G, Ratner P, Repsher L, van As A

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1996 Apr;109(4):945-52. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.4.945.

Abstract

Nedocromil sodium and cromolyn sodium are the only two currently available nonsteroid anti-inflammatory agents for treatment of asthma. Clinical differences between the two agents remain under continuous investigation with reports differentiating the two on the basis of atopy of the patient and reversibility of bronchoconstriction. This study investigated the efficacy of nedocromil sodium (4 mg, qid) for treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma in comparison to placebo using cromolyn sodium (2 mg, qid) as an active control treatment. Patients were primarily allergic asthmatics (with at least 15% reversibility) previously maintained on a regimen of regular bronchodilator therapy. During a 2-week run-in period, the patient's slow-release theophylline therapy was removed, and the patients were randomized to treatment after deterioration of asthma control (asthma symptom summary score of 3 for 7 of the 14 days). After 8 weeks of treatment, patients were returned to as occasion requires bronchodilator therapy, as per the 2-week baseline period. The results demonstrate that patients treated with nedocromil sodium showed statistically significant improvements during the primary time period (mean weeks 3 through 8) over placebo-treated patients as evidenced by all indexes of asthma symptoms, pulmonary function measures, and decreased bronchodilator reliance (p<0.05). Patients treated with cromolyn sodium demonstrated similar improvements over placebo-treated patients. Comparisons between nedocromil sodium and cromolyn sodium showed the two agents to be comparable in this group of primarily allergic patients with reversible disease. Between-group differences were noted for 3 of the 13 variables (nighttime asthma, FEV1, and forced expiratory flow rate between 25 % and 75% of the FVC) in favor of cromolyn sodium when the data were pooled during the primary time period. The number of patients missing 1 or more days from work/school/regular activity due to asthma was significantly fewer compared with placebo, and favoring nedocromil sodium over cromolyn sodium. No differences were observed among the three treatments for adverse events. This study demonstrated that in primarily allergic patients with reversible airways disease, nedocromil sodium and cromolyn sodium are both significantly more effective than placebo for treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma.

摘要

奈多罗米钠和色甘酸钠是目前仅有的两种可用于治疗哮喘的非甾体抗炎药。两种药物之间的临床差异仍在持续研究中,有报告根据患者的特应性和支气管收缩的可逆性对两者进行区分。本研究调查了奈多罗米钠(4毫克,每日四次)与安慰剂相比治疗轻至中度哮喘的疗效,并使用色甘酸钠(2毫克,每日四次)作为活性对照治疗。患者主要为过敏性哮喘患者(至少有15%的可逆性),此前一直采用常规支气管扩张剂治疗方案。在为期2周的导入期内,停用患者的缓释茶碱治疗,在哮喘控制恶化(14天中有7天哮喘症状总评分为3分)后将患者随机分组进行治疗。治疗8周后,根据2周的基线期情况,视需要让患者恢复支气管扩张剂治疗。结果表明,与安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受奈多罗米钠治疗的患者在主要时间段(第3周至第8周)内,哮喘症状的所有指标、肺功能测量值以及支气管扩张剂依赖程度降低方面均有统计学意义的改善(p<0.05)。接受色甘酸钠治疗的患者与安慰剂治疗的患者相比也有类似改善。奈多罗米钠和色甘酸钠之间的比较表明,在这组主要为患有可逆性疾病的过敏性患者中,两种药物效果相当。在主要时间段合并数据时,13个变量中有3个(夜间哮喘、第一秒用力呼气量以及用力肺活量25%至75%之间的用力呼气流量)的组间差异显示色甘酸钠更具优势。因哮喘而缺勤/缺课/无法进行日常活动1天或以上的患者数量与安慰剂相比显著减少,且奈多罗米钠优于色甘酸钠。三种治疗在不良事件方面未观察到差异。本研究表明,在主要为患有可逆性气道疾病的过敏性患者中,奈多罗米钠和色甘酸钠在治疗轻至中度哮喘方面均显著优于安慰剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验