Suppr超能文献

利用氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)评估肺部病变。有和无既往恶性肿瘤病史患者的检查结果比较。

Evaluation of pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET. Comparison of findings in patients with and without a history of prior malignancy.

作者信息

Knight S B, Delbeke D, Stewart J R, Sandler M P

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn., USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1996 Apr;109(4):982-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.4.982.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary lesions both in patients with and without a history of prior malignancy.

DESIGN

Forty-eight consecutive patients with pulmonary lesions suspicious for malignancy underwent FDG-PET scanning. Group 1 included 27 patients without and group 2 included 21 patients with a history of malignancy. Pathologic proof of diagnosis was obtained for 32 patients and 16 patients were followed up clinically and radiographically for at least 6 month. The standard uptake ratio (SUR) and the lesion to background (L/B) ratio were determined in 45 patients.

SETTING

Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

RESULTS

In group 1, the average SUR and L/B ratio for malignant lesions (n=14) were 8.9 +/- 4.9 and 20.6 +/- 14.2, respectively. For benign lesions (n=12), the average SUR was 3.3 +/- 3.2 and L/B ratio was 5.2 +/- 5.5. In group 2, the average SUR and L/B ratio for malignant lesions were not significantly different from group 1. Using either a SUR greater than 2.5 or L/B ratio greater than 5 as an cutoff level to differentiate benign and malignant lesions, the sensitivity and negative predictive value in both groups were 100%. There were five false-positive studies in group 1 and one in group 2, including tuberculosis (n=2), a granulomatous lesion (n=1), an inflammatory lesion (n=1), a schwannoma (n=1), and a fibrous mesothelioma (n=1). The overall accuracy was 88%, 81% in group 1, and 95% in group 2.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET can identify malignant pulmonary lesions both in patients without and with a history of prior malignancy with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for lesions greater than 1 cm (100% in this study). High FDG uptake by some inflammatory processes and benign tumors may cause false-positive results. Semiquantitative evaluation using SUR or L/B ratio provides similar accuracy.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在评估使用F-18氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在鉴别有无既往恶性肿瘤病史患者的良性和恶性肺部病变方面的准确性。

设计

48例连续的肺部病变疑似恶性肿瘤的患者接受了FDG-PET扫描。第1组包括27例无既往恶性肿瘤病史的患者,第2组包括21例有既往恶性肿瘤病史的患者。32例患者获得了病理诊断证据,16例患者进行了至少6个月的临床和影像学随访。45例患者测定了标准摄取值(SUR)和病变与本底(L/B)比值。

研究地点

范德比尔特大学医学中心。

结果

在第1组中,恶性病变(n = 14)的平均SUR和L/B比值分别为8.9±4.9和20.6±14.2。良性病变(n = 12)的平均SUR为3.3±3.2,L/B比值为5.2±5.5。在第2组中,恶性病变的平均SUR和L/B比值与第1组无显著差异。以SUR大于2.5或L/B比值大于5作为鉴别良性和恶性病变的临界值,两组的敏感性和阴性预测值均为100%。第1组有5例假阳性研究,第2组有1例假阳性研究,包括肺结核(n = 2)、肉芽肿性病变(n = 1)、炎性病变(n = 1)、神经鞘瘤(n = 1)和纤维性间皮瘤(n = 1)。总体准确率为88%,第1组为81%,第2组为95%。

结论

FDG-PET能够鉴别有无既往恶性肿瘤病史患者的恶性肺部病变,对于大于1 cm的病变具有较高的敏感性和阴性预测值(本研究中为100%)。一些炎性过程和良性肿瘤的高FDG摄取可能导致假阳性结果。使用SUR或L/B比值进行半定量评估可提供相似的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验