Mathis C E, Johnson D F, Collier G
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 May;65(3):527-47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-527.
In two experiments, rats living in a closed economy were offered continuous, concurrent access to four resources: food, water, a nest, and a running wheel. Costs of consuming food and water were imposed with bar-press requirements, and the price of either one or both resources was raised. As the consumption cost increased, less was consumed in each bout of resource use. Bout frequency increased, but not sufficiently to compensate for the fall in bout size, and total intake fell. Food and water tended to be complementary resources, in that as intake of one fell with its price, intake of the other also decreased. This interaction was accounted for by the defense of the ratio of body water to lean body mass. As amount consumed decreased, increases in feed efficiency (weight gain per unit of food ingested) and the use of stored calories compensated for the reduced energy intake. There was evidence of competition between feeding and drinking at the higher costs: When both commodities were expensive, the decline in the intake of each one was greater than when only one commodity was expensive. Although the time spent nesting, running, and in unmonitored activity was adjusted when feeding or drinking took more of the rat's day, there was no particular activity that was sacrificed.
在两项实验中,生活在封闭环境中的大鼠可以持续、同时获取四种资源:食物、水、巢穴和跑步机。通过按压杠杆的要求来设定消耗食物和水的成本,并且提高其中一种或两种资源的价格。随着消费成本的增加,每次资源使用回合中的消费量减少。回合频率增加,但不足以弥补回合规模的下降,总摄入量下降。食物和水往往是互补资源,因为随着一种资源的摄入量随着其价格下降,另一种资源的摄入量也会减少。这种相互作用是由身体水分与瘦体重的比例维持来解释的。随着消费量的减少,饲料效率(每摄入单位食物的体重增加)的提高和储存热量的利用弥补了能量摄入的减少。有证据表明,在成本较高时,进食和饮水之间存在竞争:当两种商品都昂贵时,每种商品摄入量的下降幅度大于只有一种商品昂贵时的情况。尽管当进食或饮水占用大鼠更多时间时,筑巢、跑步和未监测活动所花费的时间会进行调整,但没有特定的活动被牺牲。