Cookson B D, Aparicio P, Deplano A, Struelens M, Goering R, Marples R
Laboratory of Hospital Infection, Central Public Health Laboratory, London, UK.
J Med Microbiol. 1996 Mar;44(3):179-84. doi: 10.1099/00222615-44-3-179.
The results of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of chromosomal DNA of the same 12 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains of diverse geographical origin, performed in three different laboratories were compared; one laboratory used field-inversion gel electrophoresis (FIGE), one used contour clamped homogenous electrophoresis (CHEF) and one used both (all manufactured by BioRad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). No single method produced the maximum number of chromosomal fragments from all isolates. In only four instances were the same number of fragments identified by any two techniques. Although there were similar trends in strain identification the results showed many discrepancies even with a three-band difference rule to discriminate between strains. Plasmids in seven of the isolates produced a fragment, but this did not affect discrimination of the study isolates. There is a great need to standardise methodology and produce a standard set of strains to assist in this process.
比较了在三个不同实验室对来自不同地理区域的12株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)进行染色体DNA脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)的结果;一个实验室使用场反转凝胶电泳(FIGE),一个使用轮廓钳制均匀电泳(CHEF),还有一个同时使用这两种方法(均由美国加利福尼亚州赫拉克勒斯市的伯乐公司生产)。没有一种单一方法能从所有分离株中产生最多数量的染色体片段。只有在四种情况下,任意两种技术鉴定出的片段数量相同。尽管在菌株鉴定上有相似趋势,但结果显示即使采用三条带差异规则来区分菌株,仍存在许多差异。七个分离株中的质粒产生了一个片段,但这并不影响对研究分离株的鉴别。非常需要对方法进行标准化并产生一套标准菌株来辅助这一过程。