Suppr超能文献

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌分型的脉冲场凝胶电泳法的中心间比较

Inter-centre comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for the typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

作者信息

Cookson B D, Aparicio P, Deplano A, Struelens M, Goering R, Marples R

机构信息

Laboratory of Hospital Infection, Central Public Health Laboratory, London, UK.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 1996 Mar;44(3):179-84. doi: 10.1099/00222615-44-3-179.

Abstract

The results of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of chromosomal DNA of the same 12 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains of diverse geographical origin, performed in three different laboratories were compared; one laboratory used field-inversion gel electrophoresis (FIGE), one used contour clamped homogenous electrophoresis (CHEF) and one used both (all manufactured by BioRad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). No single method produced the maximum number of chromosomal fragments from all isolates. In only four instances were the same number of fragments identified by any two techniques. Although there were similar trends in strain identification the results showed many discrepancies even with a three-band difference rule to discriminate between strains. Plasmids in seven of the isolates produced a fragment, but this did not affect discrimination of the study isolates. There is a great need to standardise methodology and produce a standard set of strains to assist in this process.

摘要

比较了在三个不同实验室对来自不同地理区域的12株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)进行染色体DNA脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)的结果;一个实验室使用场反转凝胶电泳(FIGE),一个使用轮廓钳制均匀电泳(CHEF),还有一个同时使用这两种方法(均由美国加利福尼亚州赫拉克勒斯市的伯乐公司生产)。没有一种单一方法能从所有分离株中产生最多数量的染色体片段。只有在四种情况下,任意两种技术鉴定出的片段数量相同。尽管在菌株鉴定上有相似趋势,但结果显示即使采用三条带差异规则来区分菌株,仍存在许多差异。七个分离株中的质粒产生了一个片段,但这并不影响对研究分离株的鉴别。非常需要对方法进行标准化并产生一套标准菌株来辅助这一过程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验