• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非老年人的医疗储蓄账户能降低医疗成本吗?

Can medical savings accounts for the nonelderly reduce health care costs?

作者信息

Keeler E B, Malkin J D, Goldman D P, Buchanan J L

机构信息

Health Sciences Program, RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1996 Jun 5;275(21):1666-71.

PMID:8637141
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand how medical savings account (MSA) legislation for the nonelderly would affect health care costs.

DESIGN

Economic policy evaluation based on the RAND Health Expenditures Simulation Model.

SETTING

National probability sample of nonelderly noninstitutionalized households.

PARTICIPANTS

Persons in 23 157 sampled households from the 1993 Current Population Survey.

INTERVENTIONS

Medical savings account legislation would allow all Americans who are covered only by a catastrophic health care plan to set up a tax-exempt account that they can use to pay medical bills not covered by their health insurance. The interventions we evaluate differ in the deductibles of the catastrophic plan and in whether the employee or employer funds the MSA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in national health expenditures and net societal benefits of health care.

RESULTS

If all insured nonelderly Americans switched to MSAs, their health care expenditures would decline by between 0% and 13%, depending on how the MSAs are designed. However, not all nonelderly Americans would choose MSAs; taking into account selection patterns, health spending would change by + 1% to -2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical savings account legislation would have little impact on health care costs of Americans with employer-provided insurance. However, depending on the size of the catastrophic limit, waste from the excessive use of generously insured care could be reduced, and MSAs would be attractive to both sick and healthy people.

摘要

目的

了解针对非老年人的医疗储蓄账户(MSA)立法将如何影响医疗保健成本。

设计

基于兰德医疗支出模拟模型的经济政策评估。

背景

非老年人非机构化家庭的全国概率样本。

参与者

来自1993年当前人口调查的23157个抽样家庭中的人员。

干预措施

医疗储蓄账户立法将允许所有仅参加灾难性医疗保险计划的美国人设立一个免税账户,用于支付其医疗保险未涵盖的医疗费用。我们评估的干预措施在灾难性计划的免赔额以及员工或雇主为医疗储蓄账户提供资金方面存在差异。

主要结局指标

国家医疗支出的变化以及医疗保健的净社会效益。

结果

如果所有参保的非老年人美国人都转而使用医疗储蓄账户,其医疗保健支出将下降0%至13%,具体取决于医疗储蓄账户的设计方式。然而,并非所有非老年人美国人都会选择医疗储蓄账户;考虑到选择模式,医疗支出将变化+1%至-2%。

结论

医疗储蓄账户立法对有雇主提供保险的美国人的医疗保健成本影响不大。然而,根据灾难性限额的大小,过度使用高额保险护理造成的浪费可能会减少,并且医疗储蓄账户对患病和健康的人都有吸引力。

相似文献

1
Can medical savings accounts for the nonelderly reduce health care costs?非老年人的医疗储蓄账户能降低医疗成本吗?
JAMA. 1996 Jun 5;275(21):1666-71.
2
How will medical savings accounts affect medical spending?医疗储蓄账户将如何影响医疗支出?
Inquiry. 1996 Fall;33(3):225-36.
3
Medical savings accounts. American College of Physicians.医疗储蓄账户。美国医师学会。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Aug 15;125(4):333-40.
4
Can MSAs help reduce healthcare costs?医疗储蓄账户有助于降低医疗成本吗?
Healthc Financ Manage. 1996 Apr;50(4):34-6, 38.
5
Out-of-pocket health spending by poor and near-poor elderly Medicare beneficiaries.贫困和接近贫困的老年医疗保险受益人的自付医疗费用。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):241-54.
6
How will changes in health insurance tax policy and employer health plan contributions affect access to health care and health care costs?医疗保险税收政策和雇主健康计划缴款的变化将如何影响医疗保健的可及性和医疗保健成本?
JAMA. 1994;271(12):939-44.
7
Simulating the impact of medical savings accounts on small business.模拟医疗储蓄账户对小企业的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Apr;35(1 Pt 1):53-75.
8
Medical savings accounts: in the spotlight on Capitol Hill.
HMO. 1995 May-Jun;36(3):80-8.
9
Employer-sponsored insurance: how much financial protection does it provide?雇主提供的保险:它能提供多少经济保障?
Med Care Res Rev. 2002 Dec;59(4):440-54. doi: 10.1177/107755802237810.
10
Medical savings accounts and managed care: a mismatch?医疗储蓄账户与管理式医疗:不匹配?
Manag Care. 1996 Oct;5(10):27-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral Hazard in Health Insurance: What We Know and How We Know It.健康保险中的道德风险:我们所知道的以及我们如何知晓它。
J Eur Econ Assoc. 2018 Aug;16(4):957-982. doi: 10.1093/jeea/jvy017. Epub 2018 May 3.
2
The RAND Health Insurance Experiment, three decades later.《兰德健康保险实验 30 年后》
J Econ Perspect. 2013 Winter;27(1):197-222. doi: 10.1257/jep.27.1.197.
3
Consumer-oriented health care reform strategies: a review of the evidence on managed competition and consumer-directed health insurance.面向消费者的医疗保健改革策略:管理竞争和消费者导向的健康保险证据回顾。
Milbank Q. 2009 Dec;87(4):820-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00580.x.
4
Evaluation of the effect of a consumer-driven health plan on medical care expenditures and utilization.评估消费者驱动型健康计划对医疗保健支出和使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1189-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00282.x.
5
Medical Savings Accounts in publicly funded health care systems: enthusiasm versus evidence.公共资助医疗体系中的医疗储蓄账户:热情与证据
CMAJ. 2002 Jul 23;167(2):159-62.
6
Simulating the impact of medical savings accounts on small business.模拟医疗储蓄账户对小企业的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Apr;35(1 Pt 1):53-75.
7
Managed care research: moving beyond incremental thinking.管理式医疗研究:超越渐进式思维
Health Serv Res. 1997 Dec;32(5):679-90.
8
Managed care and diabetes, with special attention to the issue of who should provide care.管理式医疗与糖尿病,特别关注应由谁提供护理的问题。
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1997;108:184-95; discussion 196-9.