Suppr超能文献

使用彩色双功超声和踝/臂压力指数测量法对下肢动脉评估的比较。

Comparison of lower limb arterial assessments using color-duplex ultrasound and ankle/brachial pressure index measurements.

作者信息

Allen J, Oates C P, Henderson J, Jago J, Whittingham T A, Chamberlain J, Jones N A, Murray A

机构信息

The Regional Medical Physics Department, Freeman Hosptial, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Angiology. 1996 Mar;47(3):225-32. doi: 10.1177/000331979604700302.

Abstract

The strength of agreement between two noninvasive methods of assessing lower limb arterial disease and their relationship to patient symptoms following exercise have been investigated. Color-duplex ultrasound (CDU) and ankle/brachial pressure index (ABPI) (before and afer exercise) measurements were obtained from 200 consecutive patients referred to a vascular investigations laboratory. From these patients, 290 limbs were available for study, comprising limbs without previous vascular surgery, from patients without diabetes and who could attempt a walking exercise test. The overall level of agreement between CDU and resting ABPI measurements was 83% (Kappa 0.66). The ABPI technique identified the more serious disease; a resting ABPI of less than 0.6 gave 100% agreement with CDU. With higher resting ABPIs the level of agreement became poorer: 83% (0.6 < or = ABPI <0.9) and 76% (normal ABPI > or = 0.9). The addition of postexercise ABPI measurements in determining significant arterial disease increased the strength of relationship between the two techniques by only 2% (85%, Kappa 0.69). The exercise test was generally limited by the most symptomatic limb in each patient, and the agreement between CDU and postexercise ABPI measurements in these limbs was higher at 93% (Kappa 0.81). In comparison, agreement for the least symptomatic group of limbs was found to be poor (69%, Kappa 0.37). Compared with symptoms after exercise, overall agreements with CDU and ABPI were both 67% (Kappa 0.27). The agreement was better (91%) when the resting ABPI was less than 0.6. The ABPI is biased toward the detection of more severe disease and is more consistent with CDU when the most symptomatic limbs are compared. The relationship between either test and symptoms after exercise is strong only for limbs with major disease.

摘要

研究了两种评估下肢动脉疾病的非侵入性方法之间的一致性强度及其与运动后患者症状的关系。对连续转诊至血管检查实验室的200例患者进行了彩色双功超声(CDU)和踝/臂压力指数(ABPI)(运动前后)测量。从这些患者中,有290条肢体可供研究,包括未接受过血管手术、无糖尿病且能够尝试步行运动试验患者的肢体。CDU与静息ABPI测量之间的总体一致性水平为83%(Kappa值为0.66)。ABPI技术能识别出更严重的疾病;静息ABPI小于0.6时与CDU的一致性为100%。静息ABPI越高,一致性越差:83%(0.6≤ABPI<0.9)和76%(正常ABPI≥0.9)。运动后ABPI测量在确定显著动脉疾病方面的增加仅使两种技术之间的关系强度提高了2%(85%,Kappa值为0.69)。运动试验通常受每位患者症状最明显肢体的限制,这些肢体中CDU与运动后ABPI测量之间的一致性较高,为93%(Kappa值为0.81)。相比之下,症状最不明显的肢体组的一致性较差(69%,Kappa值为0.37)。与运动后症状相比,与CDU和ABPI的总体一致性均为67%(Kappa值为0.27)。当静息ABPI小于0.6时,一致性更好(91%)。ABPI倾向于检测更严重的疾病,在比较症状最明显的肢体时与CDU更一致。仅对于患有严重疾病的肢体,两种检测方法与运动后症状之间的关系才较强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验