• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

配偶相似性模型:在双胞胎及其配偶中测量的流体能力的应用。

Models of spouse similarity: applications to fluid ability measured in twins and their spouses.

作者信息

Reynolds C A, Baker L A, Pedersen N L

机构信息

Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado at Boulder 80309-0447, USA.

出版信息

Behav Genet. 1996 Mar;26(2):73-88. doi: 10.1007/BF02359886.

DOI:10.1007/BF02359886
PMID:8639154
Abstract

Genetic influences have consistently been reported to be the principal explanation for resemblance among relatives for intelligence, with shared environmental effects playing a much smaller role. However, crucial to understanding the nature of environmental influences are the mechanisms of assortative mating. Phenotypic assortment, albeit widely assumed or modeled in biometrical analyses, may be less important than other assortment processes, such as social homogamy. Consequently, effects of shared environment may play a greater role than prior studies have suggested. The goal of this study was to resolve environmental and genetic influences on fluid ability based on alternative models of assortment by examining the similarity of monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins and their spouses. Raven's Progressive Matrices scores were available from a population-based Swedish sample of 138 twin kinships. The effects of both social homogamy and phenotypic assortment were tested simultaneously in each of two alternate assortment models. A factor/delta path model represented social homogamy as a common factor and phenotypic assortment as a delta path, while a delta/delta path model represented both social homogamy and phenotypic assortment as delta paths. Overall, the factor/delta path model was found to be superior. Results suggested that social homogamy completely explained spouse similarity; phenotypic assortment was not significant. The results of these analyses suggest the presence of shared environmental effects among twins and their spouses, which would have been underestimated if only phenotypic modeled phenotypic assortment may have underestimated the effects of environment.

摘要

一直以来,遗传影响都被认为是亲属间智力相似性的主要解释,而共享环境影响所起的作用则小得多。然而,理解环境影响本质的关键在于选型交配机制。表型选型交配尽管在生物统计学分析中被广泛假设或建模,但可能不如其他选型交配过程重要,比如社会同质性。因此,共享环境的影响可能比先前研究所表明的更大。本研究的目的是通过检验同卵(MZ)和异卵(DZ)双胞胎及其配偶的相似性,基于替代的选型交配模型来解析环境和遗传对流体能力的影响。瑞文标准推理测验分数来自瑞典一个基于人群的包含138对双胞胎亲属关系的样本。在两个替代选型交配模型中的每一个中,同时检验了社会同质性和表型选型交配的影响。一个因素/增量路径模型将社会同质性表示为一个共同因素,将表型选型交配表示为一条增量路径,而一个增量/增量路径模型将社会同质性和表型选型交配都表示为增量路径。总体而言,发现因素/增量路径模型更优。结果表明社会同质性完全解释了配偶间的相似性;表型选型交配不显著。这些分析结果表明双胞胎及其配偶之间存在共享环境影响,如果仅对表型进行建模,表型选型交配可能低估了环境的影响。

相似文献

1
Models of spouse similarity: applications to fluid ability measured in twins and their spouses.配偶相似性模型:在双胞胎及其配偶中测量的流体能力的应用。
Behav Genet. 1996 Mar;26(2):73-88. doi: 10.1007/BF02359886.
2
Multivariate models of mixed assortment: phenotypic assortment and social homogamy for education and fluid ability.混合组合的多变量模型:教育和流体能力的表型组合与社会同质性
Behav Genet. 2000 Nov;30(6):455-76. doi: 10.1023/a:1010250818089.
3
A model system for analysis of family resemblance in extended kinships of twins.一种用于分析双胞胎远亲家族相似性的模型系统。
Behav Genet. 1994 Jan;24(1):35-49. doi: 10.1007/BF01067927.
4
Reconsidering the heritability of intelligence in adulthood: taking assortative mating and cultural transmission into account.重新考虑成年后智力的遗传性:考虑到亲缘交配和文化传递的作用。
Behav Genet. 2012 Mar;42(2):187-98. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9507-9. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
5
Spousal resemblance for smoking: Underlying mechanisms and effects of cohort and age.配偶间吸烟行为的相似性:队列和年龄的潜在机制及影响
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Aug 1;153:221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 May 27.
6
The mechanism of assortative mating for educational attainment: a study of Finnish and Dutch twins and their spouses.教育程度的选型交配机制:芬兰和荷兰双胞胎及其配偶的研究。
Front Genet. 2023 Jun 14;14:1150697. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1150697. eCollection 2023.
7
Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish twins and their spouses.按身高和体重指数进行的选型婚配:芬兰双胞胎及其配偶
Am J Hum Biol. 2003 Sep-Oct;15(5):620-7. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.10183.
8
Understanding The Role of Mate Selection Processes in Couples' Pair-Bonding Behavior.理解择偶过程在伴侣配对行为中的作用。
Behav Genet. 2016 Jan;46(1):143-9. doi: 10.1007/s10519-015-9766-y. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
9
Marital resemblance for obsessive-compulsive, anxious and depressive symptoms in a population-based sample.基于人群样本的强迫、焦虑和抑郁症状的婚姻相似性。
Psychol Med. 2008 Dec;38(12):1731-40. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003024. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
10
No differential heritability of intelligence test scores across ability levels in Norway.挪威不同能力水平的智力测试分数不存在差异遗传力。
Behav Genet. 1994 Jul;24(4):337-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01067534.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding indirect assortative mating and its intergenerational consequences for educational attainment.理解间接选型交配及其对教育成就的代际影响。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jun 6;16(1):5264. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60483-0.
2
Familial aggregation and heritability of markers of metabolic risk, physical activity, and physical fitness in nuclear families from Muzambinho (Minas Gerais, Brazil).来自穆赞比尼奥(巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州)核心家庭的代谢风险、身体活动及体能标志物的家族聚集性和遗传力
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May-Jun;63(3):215-221. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000137. Epub 2019 May 2.
3
Familial aggregation of metabolic syndrome indicators in Portuguese families.葡萄牙家族中代谢综合征指标的家族聚集性。
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:314823. doi: 10.1155/2013/314823. Epub 2013 Sep 22.
4
The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era.在组学时代,双胞胎研究仍然具有重要价值。
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Sep;13(9):640-53. doi: 10.1038/nrg3243. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
5
Genetic and environmental contributions to the association between anthropometric measures and iq: a study of Minnesota twins at age 11 and 17.遗传和环境因素对身高体重指数与智商之间关联的影响:明尼苏达州双胞胎 11 岁和 17 岁时的研究。
Behav Genet. 2012 May;42(3):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9521-y. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
6
Variation in human mate choice: simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting, and assortative mating.人类配偶选择的变异:同时调查遗传力、父母影响、性印记和选择性交配。
Am Nat. 2011 May;177(5):605-16. doi: 10.1086/659629.
7
Genetics of educational attainment in Australian twins: sex differences and secular changes.澳大利亚双胞胎教育成就的遗传学:性别差异与长期变化
Behav Genet. 1996 Mar;26(2):89-102. doi: 10.1007/BF02359887.

本文引用的文献

1
Familial studies of intelligence: a review.智力的家族研究:综述
Science. 1981 May 29;212(4498):1055-9. doi: 10.1126/science.7195071.
2
Spouse similarity in American and Swedish couples.美国和瑞典夫妇中的配偶相似性。
Behav Genet. 1980 Jan;10(1):59-71. doi: 10.1007/BF01067319.
3
How much could we boost scholastic achievement and IQ scores? A direct answer from a French adoption study.我们能在多大程度上提高学业成绩和智商分数?一项法国收养研究给出的直接答案。
Cognition. 1982 Sep;12(2):165-96. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90011-7.
4
Sense and nonsense in genetic epidemiology: a critique of the statistical model of Williams and Iyer.遗传流行病学中的合理与不合理之处:对威廉姆斯和伊耶统计模型的批判
Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1984;33(4):557-63. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000007078.
5
Analysis of family resemblance. II. A linear model for familial correlation.家族相似性分析。II. 家族相关性的线性模型。
Am J Hum Genet. 1974 May;26(3):331-59.
6
Assortative mating, or who marries whom?选型交配,或者说谁与谁结婚?
Behav Genet. 1972 Jun-Sep;2(2):127-57. doi: 10.1007/BF01065686.
7
Resolving the effects of phenotype and social background on mate selection.解析表型和社会背景对配偶选择的影响。
Behav Genet. 1985 Jan;15(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01071929.
8
A general multivariate approach to linear modeling in human genetics.人类遗传学中线性建模的一般多变量方法。
Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Dec;39(6):775-86.
9
Sex and age differences on the Raven's matrices.瑞文推理测验中的性别与年龄差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 1987 Aug;65(1):45-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1987.65.1.45.
10
Social inequality and assortative mating: cause or consequence?社会不平等与选型交配:原因还是后果?
Behav Genet. 1987 Jan;17(1):9-17. doi: 10.1007/BF01066007.