Suppr超能文献

人类配偶选择的变异:同时调查遗传力、父母影响、性印记和选择性交配。

Variation in human mate choice: simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting, and assortative mating.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Am Nat. 2011 May;177(5):605-16. doi: 10.1086/659629.

Abstract

Human mate choice is central to individuals' lives and to the evolution of the species, but the basis of variation in mate choice is not well understood. Here we looked at a large community-based sample of twins and their partners and parents ([Formula: see text] individuals) to test for genetic and family environmental influences on mate choice, while controlling for and not controlling for the effects of assortative mating. Key traits were analyzed, including height, body mass index, age, education, income, personality, social attitudes, and religiosity. This revealed near-zero genetic influences on male and female mate choice over all traits and no significant genetic influences on mate choice for any specific trait. A significant family environmental influence was found for the age and income of females' mate choices, possibly reflecting parental influence over mating decisions. We also tested for evidence of sexual imprinting, where individuals acquire mate-choice criteria during development by using their opposite-sex parent as the template of a desirable mate; there was no such effect for any trait. The main discernible pattern of mate choice was assortative mating; we found that partner similarity was due to initial choice rather than convergence and also at least in part to phenotypic matching.

摘要

人类的择偶行为是个体生活和物种进化的核心,但择偶行为的变异基础还没有得到很好的理解。在这里,我们研究了一个大型的基于社区的双胞胎及其伴侣和父母([公式:见文本] 人)的样本,以测试择偶行为的遗传和家庭环境影响,同时控制和不控制同型交配的影响。分析了关键特征,包括身高、体重指数、年龄、教育、收入、个性、社会态度和宗教信仰。这表明,在所有特征上,男性和女性的择偶行为几乎没有遗传影响,而对于任何特定特征,择偶行为也没有显著的遗传影响。对于女性择偶的年龄和收入,发现了显著的家庭环境影响,这可能反映了父母对交配决策的影响。我们还测试了性印记的证据,即个体在发育过程中通过使用其异性父母作为理想伴侣的模板来获得择偶标准;对于任何特征都没有这种影响。择偶行为的主要可识别模式是同型交配;我们发现,伴侣的相似性是由于最初的选择而不是趋同,并且至少部分是由于表型匹配。

相似文献

2
Multiple mating reveals complex patterns of assortative mating by personality and body size.
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):125-35. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12436. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
3
Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1997 May;72(2):283-327. doi: 10.1017/s0006323196005014.
4
Trading height for education in the marriage market.
Am J Hum Biol. 2015 Mar-Apr;27(2):164-74. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22629. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
5
Imprint of assortative mating on the human genome.
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Dec;2(12):948-954. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0476-3. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
6
Mate selection in man: evidence, theory, and outcome.
Soc Biol. 1984 Fall-Winter;31(3-4):243-78. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1984.9988579.
7
The Role of Genes and Environment in Degree of Partner Self-Similarity.
Behav Genet. 2017 Jan;47(1):25-35. doi: 10.1007/s10519-016-9808-0. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
9
Sexual imprinting on facial traits of opposite-sex parents in humans.
Evol Psychol. 2012 Sep 5;10(3):621-30. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000318.
10
Facialmetric similarities mediate mate choice: sexual imprinting on opposite-sex parents.
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 7;276(1654):91-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1021.

引用本文的文献

1
Partner traits of women in arranged and self-choice marriages.
Evol Hum Sci. 2025 Feb 7;7:e16. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2025.11. eCollection 2025.
2
Genetic and environmental contribution to phenotypic resemblance between Iranian couples: Tehran Cardiometabolic and Genetic Study (TCGS).
Heliyon. 2025 Feb 1;11(3):e42401. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42401. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.
3
Response to MHC-based olfactory cues in a mate choice context in two species of darter (Percidae: Etheostoma).
Ecol Evol. 2024 Feb 21;14(2):e11025. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11025. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Assortative mating on blood type: Evidence from one million Chinese pregnancies.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 20;119(51):e2209643119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209643119. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
8
Consistency of Eye Coloration Across Different Relationship Partners.
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Jan;52(1):291-300. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02450-0. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
10
Assortative mating biases marker-based heritability estimators.
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 3;13(1):660. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28294-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes, matter for happiness.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 19;107(42):17922-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008612107. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
2
The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces.
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 7;277(1692):2405-10. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2184. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
3
Rearing Environmental Influences on Religiousness: An Investigation of Adolescent Adoptees.
Pers Individ Dif. 2009 Oct 1;47(6):652-656. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.003.
5
Facialmetric similarities mediate mate choice: sexual imprinting on opposite-sex parents.
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 22;276(1659):1199. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1774.
6
MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: a review.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 May;34(4):497-512. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
7
Sexual imprinting on continuous variation: do female zebra finches prefer or avoid unfamiliar sons of their foster parents?
J Evol Biol. 2008 Sep;21(5):1274-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01568.x. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
8
Human oestrus.
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 May 7;275(1638):991-1000. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1425.
9
Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):245-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245.
10
Dietary patterns and heritability of food choice in a UK female twin cohort.
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007 Oct;10(5):734-48. doi: 10.1375/twin.10.5.734.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验