Campos H, Arnold K S, Balestra M E, Innerarity T L, Krauss R M
Donner Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996 Jun;16(6):794-801. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.16.6.794.
Differences in low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-binding affinity among LDL particles of different size were examined in competitive binding assays in human skin fibroblasts and LDL (d = 1.020 to 1.050 g/mL) from subjects with a predominance of large (> or = 272 A), medium (259 to 271 A), and small (< or = 257 A) LDL. Among 57 normolipidemic subjects with LDL cholesterol (-C) levels < 160 mg/dL, binding affinity was reduced by 16% in those with predominantly large LDL and by 14% in those with small LDL compared with most subjects who had a predominance of medium-size LDL and in all LDL size subgroups in 66 subjects with LDL-C > or = 160 mg/dL. Differences in LDL receptor-binding affinity were further investigated by using LDL density subfractions (I, d = 1.026 to 1.032 g/mL; II, d = 1.032 to 1.038 g/mL; and III, d = 1.038 to 1.050 g/mL) from three subjects with predominantly large (pattern A) and small (pattern B) LDL particles. The binding affinity (Kd) of LDL-II was similar for patterns A and B (9.2 +/- 1.4 and 9.4 +/- 0.7, respectively) and 30% lower in LDL-III from both groups (P < .05). The binding affinity of LDL-I in pattern A (12.6 +/- 1.5 micrograms/mg) was lower (P < .05) than that in LDL-II and LDL-I from pattern B (8.0 +/- 2.4 micrograms/mg). After incubation with a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocked the LDL receptor-binding domain of apoE, LDL-I from two pattern B subjects showed substantially lower binding affinity (Kd = 20.0 and 19.2 micrograms/mg) than in pattern A (Kd = 13.2 and 14.2 micrograms/mg), a result consistent with our finding of a higher apoE content in pattern B LDL-I (P < .001). Thus, factors associated with variations in particle size and apoE content in LDL subclasses in normolipidemic subjects contribute to the differences in LDL receptor binding that may result in differing metabolic behavior in vivo.
在人皮肤成纤维细胞的竞争性结合试验中,检测了不同大小的低密度脂蛋白(LDL)颗粒之间LDL受体结合亲和力的差异,并检测了来自以大颗粒(≥272 Å)、中颗粒(259至271 Å)和小颗粒(≤257 Å)LDL为主的受试者的LDL(密度为1.020至1.050 g/mL)。在57名LDL胆固醇(-C)水平<160 mg/dL的血脂正常受试者中,与大多数以中大小LDL为主的受试者相比,以大LDL为主的受试者的结合亲和力降低了16%,以小LDL为主的受试者的结合亲和力降低了14%;在66名LDL-C≥160 mg/dL的受试者的所有LDL大小亚组中也有类似情况。通过使用来自三名分别以大颗粒(A型)和小颗粒(B型)LDL为主的受试者的LDL密度亚组分(I,密度为1.026至1.032 g/mL;II,密度为1.032至1.038 g/mL;III,密度为1.038至1.050 g/mL),进一步研究了LDL受体结合亲和力的差异。LDL-II的结合亲和力(Kd)在A型和B型中相似(分别为9.2±1.4和9.4±0.7),两组LDL-III的结合亲和力均低30%(P<.05)。A型中LDL-I的结合亲和力(12.6±1.5微克/毫克)低于B型中LDL-II和LDL-I的结合亲和力(8.0±2.4微克/毫克)(P<.05)。在用特异性阻断载脂蛋白E的LDL受体结合结构域的单克隆抗体孵育后,两名B型受试者的LDL-I的结合亲和力(Kd = 20.0和19.2微克/毫克)显著低于A型(Kd = 13.2和14.2微克/毫克),这一结果与我们在B型LDL-I中发现的较高载脂蛋白E含量一致(P<.001)。因此,血脂正常受试者中与LDL亚类颗粒大小和载脂蛋白E含量变化相关的因素导致了LDL受体结合的差异,这可能会导致体内不同的代谢行为。