Suppr超能文献

负荷顺序改变对主动脉收缩末期压力的影响及其与左心室等容舒张的关系。

Change in aortic end-systolic pressure by alterations in loading sequence and its relation to left ventricular isovolumic relaxation.

作者信息

Kohno F, Kumada T, Kambayashi M, Hayashida W, Ishikawa N, Sasayama S

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.

出版信息

Circulation. 1996 Jun 1;93(11):2080-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.11.2080.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A brief, sustained constriction of the descending and the ascending aortas produces systolic loads at different times during ejection, and descending intervention prolongs left ventricular (LV) relaxation more than ascending intervention. Although alterations in the sequence of loading the ventricle have been suggested as a cause of such load-induced relaxation abnormalities, the relation of the loading system to relaxation has been unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

LV peak systolic pressure was elevated by approximately 40 mm Hg by constricting the descending and ascending aortas in seven anesthetized dogs. The descending intervention increased aortic end-systolic pressure (AoESP, 110.4 +/- 9.3 to 150.8 +/- 11.5 mm Hg; P < .05), reduced aortic flow (P < .05), and prolonged LV relaxation (time constant [T], 31.9 +/- 4.4 to 69.8 +/- 12.8 ms; P < .05). LV ejection time was reduced, but the systolic time interval was unchanged. In contrast, ascending intervention decreased AoESP (111.9 +/- 11.4 to 101.5 +/- 10.3 mm Hg; P < .05), reduced aortic flow (P < .05), and prolonged T (31.2 +/- 5.4 to 42.2 +/- 8.3 ms; P < .05), whereas ejection time and systolic time interval increased (both P < .01). Prolongation of T was significantly greater during descending intervention (P < .05) and was associated with an increase in AoESP during descending intervention but a decrease in AoESP during ascending intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Descending intervention induced greater prolongation of T than ascending intervention. Prolongation of T was closely related to an increase in AoESP in the descending intervention but a decrease in AoESP in the ascending intervention. These data suggest that not only the loading sequence but also the pressure level at the onset of isovolumic relaxation determines LV relaxation.

摘要

背景

对降主动脉和升主动脉进行短暂、持续的缩窄会在射血过程中的不同时间产生收缩期负荷,且降主动脉干预比升主动脉干预更能延长左心室(LV)舒张期。尽管心室负荷顺序的改变被认为是这种负荷诱导的舒张异常的一个原因,但负荷系统与舒张之间的关系尚不清楚。

方法与结果

通过对7只麻醉犬的降主动脉和升主动脉进行缩窄,使左心室收缩压峰值升高约40 mmHg。降主动脉干预增加了主动脉收缩末期压力(AoESP,从110.4±9.3 mmHg升至150.8±11.5 mmHg;P<.05),降低了主动脉血流(P<.05),并延长了左心室舒张期(时间常数[T],从31.9±4.4 ms延长至69.8±12.8 ms;P<.05)。左心室射血时间缩短,但收缩期时间间隔不变。相比之下,升主动脉干预降低了AoESP(从111.9±11.4 mmHg降至101.5±10.3 mmHg;P<.05),降低了主动脉血流(P<.05),并延长了T(从31.2±5.4 ms延长至42.2±8.3 ms;P<.05),而射血时间和收缩期时间间隔增加(均P<.01)。降主动脉干预期间T的延长显著更大(P<.05),并且与降主动脉干预期间AoESP的增加相关,但与升主动脉干预期间AoESP的降低相关。

结论

降主动脉干预比升主动脉干预导致T的延长更大。T的延长在降主动脉干预中与AoESP的增加密切相关,而在升主动脉干预中与AoESP的降低密切相关。这些数据表明,不仅负荷顺序,而且等容舒张期开始时的压力水平也决定左心室舒张。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验